Case Soap Note 2
See attachment
See attachment
Module 04 Content
1.
Top of Form
You are a Training Specialist hired by Universal Medical Supplies, Inc. This organization has been experiencing low productivity and errors in communication in the workplace. As part of an ongoing professional development series, the Vice President of the Human Resources department has tasked you with creating Critical Thinking training materials. The materials will be presented in many forms and by various means to help improve productivity and communication in the organization.
As part of the company’s training plan, they want to provide articles for the staff on the company’s intranet as required reading prior to other training activities. You will create one of those articles in the form of a blog post. It should provide an overview and give concrete examples of logical fallacies being used in the news and social media.
Instructions
Use online resources to create a blog post that illustrates how logical fallacies and audience manipulation appear in the news and social media. Social media may include sites like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and others.
Your blog post should be a minimum of 5 paragraphs that includes the following elements:
· An introduction to the topic of logical fallacies.
· 2 examples of audience manipulation in the
news with a clickable link to the articles inserted in the blog post. Explain each fallacy example and how it is being used to manipulate the audience.
· 2 examples of audience manipulation in
social media. Explain each fallacy example and how it is being used to manipulate the audience. The two examples can be from the same or different social media sites. Example: One from Facebook and one from Twitter. Insert a screenshot image of each social media post.
· A summarizing paragraph.
· References with links to your sources.
Write your blog post in a Word document. Be sure to proofread for grammar and spelling.
For assistance with logical fallacies in advertising, news, and social media, please see:
For assistance with writing a blog post, see:
·
Blog Writing: Tips and Best Practices to Keep Readers Engaged
·
The Art of Digital Marketing
Bottom of Form
EVIDENCE BASE IN DESIGN
When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.
In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
· Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
o Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only)
o Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence-Informed Practice” (pp. 137–146)
o Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only)
o Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 183–191 only)
· American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). AdvocacyLinks to an external site.. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). Step by step: Evaluating violence and injury prevention policies: Brief 4: Evaluating policy implementationLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf
· Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/
· Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementationLinks to an external site.. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
· Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patientLinks to an external site.. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1014–1017.
· Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretionLinks to an external site.. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
To Prepare:
· Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
· Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.
· Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.
You will submit a detailed outline using the template that has been uploaded below. Your submission must include sections corresponding to the following subheadings:
* Technical Aspects
Provides necessary medical and scientific information to understand the issue.
* Public Policy
Describes current and proposed changes in public policy/law.
* Arguments For and Against
Include a summary of the arguments in favor of and opposed to specific interventions, techniques, or products and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. Discuss the public policy with two additional argumentative paragraphs- one discussing the in favor of and one paragraph discussing the opposing argument
* Conclusion
Expresses your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the strength of the pro and con arguments.
Additionally, you must include:
* Topic sentences and Paragraph Transitions
Each section of your outline should include topic sentences and paragraph transitions that tie your significant points together.
# Use the template below to create the outline.
Clinical Case Report
Part 2: Case Description and Conceptualization
Part 2 of the clinical case report assignment should be in APA style (title page,
references, etc. but does not require an abstract). This part of the case report will likely
be 6-7 pages, without references. It should include:
(1) The case, with provisional diagnoses (already completed for the paper proposal but
likely modified based on my feedback and any other client information you find helpful in
conceptualization below). See above for guidelines about an effective case. (around 2
pages)
(2) A case conceptualization, to include risk and maintenance factors in the client's
diagnosis(es): (around 4-5 pages)
(2a) Should include a range of etiological factors, based on class readings and
discussions (i.e., cognitive model, memory, emotion, neurobiology,
social/contextual factors),
(2b) These etiological factors should be tied specifically to the case description
(that is, don't speak only generally of risk factors, but how this manifests for the
particular client). In some places (e.g., neurobiology), you may need to use some
conjecture, based on the literature. That is OK. However, your case should
include sufficient detail to be able to relate several risk factors to the
conceptualization.
(2c) Should include discussion of risk factors for, AND maintenance of, PTSD
and/or related symptoms
(2d) Should be integrative, as all risk and maintenance factors intersect (e.g.,
environment affects biology, social context influences both; don't just list
etiological factors)
(2e) Should consider culture and intersectionality of client.
(2f) Should include references to literature (in APA style). NOTE: Please avoid
excessive use of quoted text, instead summarizing/paraphrasing when possible.
Quoted text should be limited to points in which you think the initial wording is
absolutely necessary to convey the author's point, and, in many papers, does not
need to be used at all.
Grading Rubric for Clinical Case Report Part 2: Case Description and
Conceptualization (75 points)
____/22 Case description. Student provides detail on client's background, traumatic
experience(s), symptoms and presenting problems, impairment/distress, and within this
description, sufficient detail to support the case conceptualization.
____/35 Case conceptualization. Student describes risk AND maintenance factors
in the client's diagnosis(es), including a range of etiological factors (i.e., cognitive
model, memory, emotion, neurobiology, social/contextual factors and culture and
identity). These factors are tied specifically to the case description, when possible
and are integrative (i.e., intersections among etiological factors are discussed).
____/9 Incorporation of empirical research. Empirical research and course materials
are incorporated effectively to advance arguments and are cited appropriately in-text.
____/9 Grammar, style, mechanics. Paper is in APA style, includes references, is
proofread, and contains proper grammar, flow, transitions, and headings as appropriate.
As their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.
Discuss the differences and similarities between quantitative, qualitative and mix methods research studies.
Please include 400 words .Attached you can find the rubric to follow up
Sample Outline for Concept Analysis Paper
See chapter 3 in McEwen and Wills. Use the method by Walker and Avant Box 3-1 ( p 60
I. Title Page: Select one of the following topics
a.
Advanced Practice Competency: A Concept Analysis
b.
Diversity in Nursing: A Concept Analysis
c.
Social Determinants of Health: A Concept Analysis
Format Outline(s)
II. Introduction (
Using Walker and Avant)
a. What is the concept selected-state and define the terms
b. Aims or purposes of this analysis-why are you doing the analysis?
c. Discuss all possible uses of the concept briefly-how is the concept used in different contexts, examples and then how are you using it for this paper
d. Determine the defining attributes-regardless of where it exists, what are the common identifiers that the person has this characteristic
e. Identify a model case-Use the attributes you’ve identified and highlight them in a case. A case that is hypothetical, from a text, or that you have experienced in practice.
f. Identify a borderline case and contrary case-what is a case that is something like the model case, but misses some attributes
g. Identify antecedents and consequences-what happens before the concept instance is identified; what happens as a result of acquiring it?
h. Define empirical referents- how do you know that what you are seeing is really it? How would you measure it? Or know that you are reserving it?
MY NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 3 WHICH IS: NIH Stroke Scale
Initial post:Each student will be assigned a number randomly. Whatever your number is, select the corresponding topic below, then post a minimum of 5 bullet points about the topic.Your bullet points should address key components of the topic, such as what, how, who, & why. This information should not be basic things you learned in Med/Surg, but rather advanced critical care based. Think about this as a group effort to create a study guide. Use ONLY your textbook, but do not cut & paste from the book.Then create, find, or borrow a test style question about your topic & post at the bottom of your bullet points. The format needs to be multiple choice or select all that apply. Think NCLEX style. Each week include a paragraph with the results from one of your weekly interviews.Discussion post assignments are worth 20 points each as follows:
Week 1 Discussion 1
.
Reflect upon the survey you took(Questions survey pictures attached ) In your initial response, address some of the following questions. Explain your answers.
· Did you find it easy to make confident and decisive decisions with several strongly agree or strongly disagree answers, or did you select mostly moderate responses?
· Did any subject areas trigger personal emotions or issues? If so, do you feel you were able to remain objective?
· Were any of the decisions especially difficult to make?
· Did you employ any critical thinking or resolution strategies to determine a response?
· Did you rely on policy or legal parameters to make your decisions?
· Would you be comfortable making your answers to the survey public, or do you prefer anonymity?
· Have you dealt with similar situations and could you perceive similar situations occurring in your clinical practice?
· How might a moral inventory such as this survey impact your clinical practice?
· Compose at least 2-3 paragraphs all in APA format with proper references.
Week 1 Discussion 2
Identify examples of active and latent errors (Errors in Medicine ) . Provide examples from your clinical experience, if possible. How can such errors be avoided to support better patient care?
Compose at least 2-3 paragraphs all in APA format with proper references.
