d5 DD
please follow all direction
please follow all direction
outline the metrics you would use to measure the success of your proposed intervention. Include the source of your metrics (should be from the evidence-based practice literature) and the hypothesized outcomes you anticipate from the intervention. Include risks and both potential positive and negative outcomes.
Cite any sources in APA format.
2
BACKGROUND
This week, we examine a 31-year-old male who presents to the office with a chief complaint of insomnia.
SUBJECTIVE
Patient is a 31-year-old male. He states that his insomnia has gotten progressively worse over the past 6 months. Per the patient, he has never been a “great sleeper” but is now having difficulty both falling asleep and staying asleep at night. The problem began approximately 6 months ago after the sudden loss of his fiancé. The patient states this is affecting his ability to perform his job, which is a forklift operator at a local chemical company. The patient states he has used diphenhydramine in the past to sleep but does not like the way it makes him feel the morning after. He states he has fallen asleep on the job due to lack of sleep from the night before. The patient's medical record from his previous physician states that he has a history of opiate abuse, which began after he broke his ankle in a skiing accident and was prescribed hydrocodone/apap (acetaminophen) for acute pain management. The patient has not received a prescription for an opiate analgesic in 4 years. The patient states recently he has been using alcohol to help him fall asleep, approximately four beers prior to bed.
MENTAL STATUS EXAM
The patient is alert and oriented to person, place, time, event. He makes good eye contact and is dressed appropriately for time of year. He denies auditory/visual hallucinations. Judgement, insight, and reality contact are all intact. Patient denies suicidal/homicidal ideation, and is future oriented.
Decision Point One
Zolpidem: 10 mg daily at bedtime
Trazodone 50 mg po at bedtime
Hydroxyzine: 50 mg daily at bedtime
Examine
Case Study: Pharmacologic Approaches to the Treatment of Insomnia in a Younger Adult. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the case (1 page)
· Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
· Which decision did you select?
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
· Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Original Work, No Plagiarism, Cite and Reference
Mary admires the NIH-funded work of her postdoctoral advisor, Henryk, who pioneers research on alternative treatments for fever due to infectious diseases. Mary is one of many co-workers who has assisted Henryk in compiling the most comprehensive database ever assembled, tracking many different infectious agents, species of animals, and different interventions and their outcomes. Henryk’s interpretation of this rich dataset suggests that some “alternative medicines” are highly effective in certain species, but have no therapeutic value in others. He is completing his analysis and interpretation, and is preparing a manuscript for submission. Mary will be a co-author because of her part in collecting data for the study.
Mary is preparing to seek an Assistant Professor position and wants to build on her postdoctoral work. She asks Henryk for permission to use the dataset to develop her own project. However, she plans to use a different methodology for analysis and interpretation of the dataset to address a different aspect of the outcomes of treatment. At that point, she will develop a career development proposal to submit to the NIH.
Henryk is unwilling to share the entire dataset prior to publishing his interpretation of these data. However, Mary has access to the database as part of her current project, and therefore she decides that it is ethical for her to look more closely at the data. Mary spends quite a lot of time looking at the data and Henryk’s analysis, and realizes that he has excluded specific datapoints that impact his interpretation. Henryk’s draft manuscript carefully justifies the exclusion of these data in the methods section so that there is no issue with data falsification.
Mary realizes that if she includes these datapoints, an entirely new understanding of therapies to treat fever could emerge. Mary is excited about her impending grant proposal, but is concerned about how to broach the discussion of her use of the data with Henryk.
Discussion Questions
1. Must Henryk share his database with Mary before publication? After publication? Must he share it with others, outside his lab, and if so, when?
2. Who owns the database at this point: Henryk? The institution? NIH? The public?
3. Why is sharing a dataset beneficial to the person who collected it? How is it potentially risky?
4. Is Henryk obligated to document how datapoints were included or excluded in the methods section of his paper?
Hello class,
I chose interface to discuss. The interface in the electronic medical record system is truly remarkable. When the monitor displaying vital signs and other patient data seamlessly transfers that information to the patient's chart on the computer without the need for manual data entry, it significantly streamlines our workflow. As a nurse, you simply click to confirm that the vital signs are accurate while entering them, saving you a significant amount of time. The advantages of using an interface have proven to be incredibly beneficial in my daily nursing duties.
Liz Workman
Are you familiar with the current clinical practice guidelines for the investigation of a suspected condition such as chest pain?
Due 9/10 10 am EST
In this unit you learned about the evolution of evidence-based practice and strategies to implement evidence-based practice. You were also provided with an introduction to quantitative and qualitative research designs.
An important step in the review of literature is the ability to identify the type of research that you are reviewing.
For this assignment, you will continue to consider your problem/topic of interest (HEALTH EQUITY). Using the HU Library, search for an article that is related to your chosen problem/topic.
Review the article and identify the type of research design (quantitative, qualitative, mixed).
Name: Cara Jett
Age: 34 years
Provider: R. Mcbride NP
Allergies: NKA
Admit weight: 102 Ibs (46.3kg)
BMI: 17.5
Code status: full code
I just can’t eat. Every time I do, I have horrible pain in my stomach. My family keeps
accusing me of having an eating disorder. It’s not that I don't want to eat. It's that I can’t
without pain and diarrhea!
4/12
1345
Nursing Note: Client presents for ongoing stomach pain after eating. Current BMI of
17.5. Last recorded BMI from 3 years ago was 22.2. States pain has been ongoing for
several years, more severe as of late yesterday. Client skipped lunch today. Current
abdominal pain is 2/10. States that she has tried using over-the-counter pain relievers to
help with the abdominal pain, but this has not been successful. Rates 2/10 RLQ
abdominal pain.
4/12
1355
Neuro/Cognitive: Alert and oriented x4.
Cardiovascular: Regular heartbeat with S1 and S2 heard. No edema present. Capillary
refill <3 seconds. Bilateral pedal and radial pulses +3.
Respiratory: Lungs clear bilaterally.
Gastrointestinal: Abdomen flat, firm, hyperactive bowel sounds x 4 quadrants. Tender
in RLQ. Denies nausea. Last bowel movement was 1045 today. Loose, brown, mucous
looking – per client. Three loose stools today so far.
Genitourinary: Continent. No pain or burning when urinating
Musculoskeletal: Muscle atrophy present. +5 strengths for all extremities. Tenting
present on arm and collarbone.
Psychosocial: Anxious. Becomes tearful several times during visit. States her family is
accusing her of having an eating disorder.
5/7
1435
Nursing Note: Follow-Up Appointment with Gastrointestinal Specialist
Diagnosis: New Crohn’s disease.
Follow-up appointment after colonoscopy and upper GI procedure. Had a CT scan of the
abdomen completed after the procedure. Rates 4/10 abdominal pain. Client is taking
prednisone and metronidazole as prescribed by primary care provider for Crohn's
disease.
Date Temp HR RR BP SpO2 O2
4/12 1345 96.8 °F
(36.0 °C)
78 18 102/54 100% RA
5/1 0945 97.2 °F
(36.2 °C)
64 12 94/45 89% RA
5/1 1000 97.2 °F
(36.2 °C)
69 12 104/50 92% RA
5/1 1015 97.2 °F
(36.2 °C)
72 14 110/52 94% RA
5/7 1430 98.6 °F
(37.0 °C)
88 18 138/78 99% RA
Date Diagnostic Test Findings
5/1
1015
Upper GI
Colonoscopy
No abnormal findings.
Small ulcer found in the transverse portion of the large intestine with
evidence of more in the small intestine. Further testing, including an
MRI, is highly suggested.
5/5
1500
CT Scan of
Abdomen
Impression: Thickening of the wall of the small intestine present.
Three small abscesses noted by entrance to the colon correlating with
recent gastric studies. No fistula apparent.
5/1
0945
Endoscopy Center Nursing Note:
Client has completed an upper GI study and a colonoscopy with no noticeable
complications. Vitals stable. Drowsy but easily woken. Oriented x4.
5/1
1000
Endoscopy Center Nursing Note:
Vitals remain stable. Client drank 60mL of clear soda and two bites of graham cracker.
Swallow and gag reflex present. Mild 2/10 throat discomfort present. Driver present and
atbedside.
5/1
1015
Endoscopy Center Nursing Note:
Client discharged to home in care of mother, Nancy. Follow-up appointment made.
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING IN 50 WORDS OR MORE:
2. Nursing‐sensitive indicators are the criteria for changes in health status that nursing care can directly affect. Nursing‐sensitive indicators have been increasingly adopted as valid and reliable tools due to their features such as objective assessment, improvement of clinical practice, evaluation of nursing care quality and performance, and informed decision‐making capability for patients in selecting a hospital to receive care. The use of nursing‐sensitive indicators affects the outcomes of nursing care by defining the structure and processes of nursing care. Indicators can be used for quality improvement purposes in applied settings to monitor performance and progress and to support evidence-based decision making, to support informed policy analysis related to regulatory or accreditation requirements, workforce development, and reimbursement, and to research the role of nursing care in determining patient safety outcomes by examining structure-outcome, process-outcome, and structure-process-outcome relationships. I believe that no one nursing sensitive indicator is sufficient on its own for measuring the profession’s impact on patient care and outcomes. Rather, several elements must be considered together to provide a comprehensive view of nursing practices and results, such as patient falls with and without injuries, RN satisfaction survey, nosocomial infections, nursing hours per patient day. Indicators not included in the database statistics, but which professional nurses should consider, nonetheless are patient satisfaction with pain management, patient satisfaction with nursing care. For example, assessment and treatment of pain is complex, and optimal pain care remains elusive. Only 63-74% of patients report that their pain was well-controlled. Personal biases may interfere with healthcare’s ability to accurately assess pain management needs, but nurses who keep in mind the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice will be better equipped to make sound judgments.
Reference:
Oner, B., Zengul, F. D., Oner, N., Ivankova, N. V., Karadag, A., & Patrician, P. A. (2021). Nursing-sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997-2017). Nursing open, 8(3), 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.654
