W5 os
taking into account internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate mid-range theories or their use in research. critique Self-Efficacy theory using the internal and external critique evaluation process
Professional Development Plan
Assistance please.
Week 7 discussion
Please the PP presentation assignment in order to complete this week discussion.
nursing
Topic: Delegation
How comfortable do you believe most RNs are in the role of delegator to UAP?
A brief introductory paragraph introduces the topic of the discussion. APA form
Use current literature (5 years old or less) to support your views. Be sparing in your use of quotes. Learn to paraphrase the information you are sharing from a source. A paragraph at the end gives a brief summary of the discussion. The initial posting for each topic should be a minimum of 500 words in length (not including the references).
wk3691B
1
This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your
previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If
you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next
writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write
about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If
you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One
week for this job.
Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your
previous writings.
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933
2
Week 3: Recommendations and Conclusions
This part of your paper includes the summary of the project, main points and findings,
the significance of the project to the advanced practice nursing profession, and
recommendations for future research. Address the following:
1. Address your recommendations and implications for clinical practice.
2. Provide a summary of study and discuss any limitations of the study.
• Suggest directions for future research.
• Consider changes in theoretical constructs
• Provide suggestions for public policy and/or changes in practice.
3. Tie the theoretical framework to the overall product.
4. Conclude with an overall wrap-up to the paper.
Your paper should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
You must reference a minimum of two scholarly sources in your paper.
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Recommendations and Conclusions
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Recommendations and Conclusions
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Content
59.5 to >48.79 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides an insightful and thorough summary of
the project, main points, and findings, and details
the significance of the project to the advanced
practice nursing profession. Provides detailed
and creative recommendations for future
research and implications for clinical practice.
Discusses limitations of the study in detail.
Suggests specific directions for future research.
Insightfully considers changes in theoretical
construct and provides reasonable and creative
suggestions for public policy and/or changes in
educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical
framework to the overall product. Meets all of
the criteria of the written assignment.
59.5 pts
3
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Organization
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
Content is well written throughout. Information
is well organized and clearly communicated.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome APA Format
and Mechanics
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
All the requirements related to format, length,
source citations, and layout are followed. The
assignment is free of spelling and grammatical
errors.
3.5 pts
Total Points: 70
PreviousNext
4
- Week 3: Recommendations and Conclusions
Determination of death
Determination of Death / Informed Consent
1. Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA):
· How this law was created
· Legal definition of death, describe
2. Define dying within context of faith, basic principle about human life
3. Bioethical Analysis of Pain Management – Pain Relief
4. What is the difference between Pain and suffering? Explain
5. Diagnosis / Prognosis: define both.
6. Ordinary / Extraordinary means of life support. Explain the bioethical analysis.
7. Killing or allowing to die? Define both and explain which one is ethically correct and why?
8. Catholic declaration on life and death; give a summary of this document:
https://www.cfocf.org/wp-content/uploads/Combined-Catholic-Declaration-and-Understanding-ENGLISH.pdfLinks to an external site.
9. What is free and informed consent from the Catholic perspective?
10. Define Proxi, Surrogate
11. Explain:
· Advance Directives
· Living Will
· PoA / Durable PoA
· DNR
12. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #: 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 55, 59, 61, 62
professional identity
how best to define professional identity
m8 program critique
please follow all directions
assist week 5
Week 5 – Assignment: Support Quality Performance Improvement through Enhanced Interprofessional Communication
For your assignment this week, you will use the case study found in the week's resources titled, Case Study: A Private Practice in the Pennsylvania Chronic Care Initiative.
After reading the case study, you will take on the role of a health administration intern hired by Dr. Johnson to run his office practice, and you will prepare a draft written communication in the form of a business letter or memorandum addressed to the local Chief Executive Officer Jamie Harper (fictitious) at Hospital Anywhere (fictitious).
According to the Agency for Health Research and Quality, a challenge to improving quality in private physician practices is the lack of communication with hospital organizations to increase the exchange of information related to the emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and discharges of their patients especially when the physician does not have privileges to practice at the hospital and is not notified of the patient's medical or surgical treatments.
Your communication in the form of a business letter or memorandum as the health administration intern wrote on Dr. Johnson's behalf to CEO Jamie Harper will include the following information:
A salutation and introduction of who you are and on whose behalf you are writing. Give Dr. Johnson a fictitious first name and give the medical practice a fictitious name.
Background information in synopsis form on the operation of your physician's office practice and how and why your practice has joined the
Pennsylvania Chronic Care Initiative (PCCI). Be sure to mention the quality outcome performance of the office before and since joining the
PCCI (this information is in the case study; so, be sure to summarize the important points regarding these quality measures as it relates to the diabetic patients).
State the reason for your written communication that includes the desire to improve the interdisciplinary communication between Hospital Anywhere and your office practice especially for your diabetic patients and the potential hospital services that would be beneficial to your diabetic patients (see the Miller-Rosales and Rodriguez (2021) resource in your Weekly Resources).
Propose how using the identified hospital services will benefit the hospital and your office practice from both a healthcare quality and financial perspective.
Provide a closing paragraph in your business letter/memorandum and the appropriate complimentary signoff. Be sure to mention the attachments you are providing.
Create a tool that you propose to collect the data from the identified hospital staff following their consultations with your diabetic patients and include it in your business letter or memorandum as an Attachment 1 (see the Miller-Rosales and Rodriguez (2021) resource in your Weekly Resources).
Lastly, create a draft checklist that you will provide to your office staff to assure your diabetic patients are completing their annual tests and screenings and include it in your business letter/memorandum as Attachment 2 (see the Florida Blue Medicare Caregiver Guide (2019) in your resources).
Be creative with this assignment and enjoy its real-world applicability. While it is not a requirement for this assignment, you may wish to embellish your business letter or memorandum. You can find a business or memo templates from the MS Word templates. Click
File at the top of your Word document, then click
More Templates. Remember, if you use a template, after the first page of a memorandum, the remaining pages usually are plain. Be sure to consult APA guidelines for the use of attachments which may be called appendices.
Length: A minimum of 3-4 pages, not including the title page, reference page, or the 2 attachments
https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/research-transform-primary-care/transform/profile/gabbay.html
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20009666.2019.1593782
Florida Blue Medicare Family Caregiver Guide
Florida Blue Medicare Caregiver Guide (2019).
Florida Blue Medicare Resources.
Consult page 31 in this resource for your assignment this week to see a list of the annual tests required for diabetics.
https://www.jabfm.org/content/34/1/151
Interdisciplinary Primary Care Team Expertise and Diabetes Care Management
Miller-Rosales, C., & Rodriguez, H. P. (2021). Interdisciplinary primary care team expertise and diabetes care management.
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 34(1), 151-161. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200187.
Use this resource to complete your assignment as the researchers discuss the use of interdisciplinary care to manage patients with diabetes.
evidence based
NUR640 Week 4 Assignment 4.1 Page 1
`
Assignment Title: Research Critique
Step 4 for your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project (Research Proposal)
Assignment Overview:
Since your EBP Research Proposal does not include completing the entire research process, e.g., collecting data, statistics, or findings, you will do a critique of a Level of Evidence I-IV research article there is a rubric related to this critique that you will follow.
Deliverables:
The final copy of your Research Critique assignment is due on or before Sunday at 11:59pm, just before Week 5 begins, at the latest. Be sure to use the file naming protocol: NUR640_EBP Step4_last name_mmddyyyy.
Assignment Details:
For this assignment, you will write a research critique of a research article. It does not have to be an article similar to what you would do in a Research Proposal. It can be a research article that you find scholarly and would like to delve into more deeply. The critique does need to be a LeveI I-Level IV level of evidence. Use the discernment gained from your Week 4 Discussion regarding whether your article is credible, and use that to answer a section in your research critique.
Include the Following Sections that are noted on your research critique, and use your textbook if you are unsure of what each of these headings mean.
1. Purpose
2. Conceptual Framework
3. Design/Method
4. Sampling/Setting
5. Major variables studied and their definition
6. Data Analysis
7. Study Findings
8. Overall strengths and weaknesses of the study, e.g. reliability and validity, ethics (IRB), topic, etc.
Grading: Each part (category) listed above for your research article critique has a rubric that is to be followed. All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
image1.png
image2.jpeg
Academic writing help
We Accept
