NU 553

/in /by

HOMEWORK

WK 10 BLOG THEOR

/in /by

Yes, identifying level 1 evidence can be challenging and insightful. It appears you were able to identify evidence at large; however, you were not bale to identify evidence specific to your demographic population. With the limitation of the lack of evidence that you were able to locate, it is important that you confirm that lack of available evidence with a research librarian, especially so that you can identify and determine your next steps. If there is a lack of evidence that supports your specific topic/population, I invite you to consider searching the evidence for information about other chronic diseases and how that is addressed in rural areas. Sometimes when searching

SOAP NOTE: RSV (PEDIATRIC)

/in /by

COMMUNITY AGENCY & HEALTHY PEOPLE 2030

/in /by

USE THE UPLOADED FILES. Four(4) different works for each file (10 in total).

Turnitin and AI report required.

$20 each = $160 in total

Nursing

/in /by

 This is an FNP assignment on Family Medicine Role Development: Clinical Integration. It is a case study, please answer the 4 questions and respond separately. Please follow the instructions in the Word document. 

Dehy

/in /by

Patient Background: Maria, a 45-year-old female, presents to the emergency room with symptoms of severe dehydration following prolonged vomiting and diarrhea. Her lab results indicate the following:

  • Serum sodium: Elevated (hypernatremia)
  • Urine output: Low
  • Heart rate: Elevated (tachycardia)
  • Blood pressure: Low (hypotension)

The attending physician has ordered an IV to address Maria’s dehydration and stabilize her condition. Three IV solutions are available for consideration:

  1. 0.45% saline (hypotonic)
  2. 0.9% saline (isotonic)
  3. 3% saline (hypertonic)

Your task is to analyze the situation, considering how each IV solution would interact with Maria’s cells and overall condition, and recommend the best choice.

 

Focused SOAP Note

/in /by

please see attached

presentation 2

/in /by

A 32-year-old patient diagnosed with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and Bipolar Disorder presents with recurring intrusive thoughts related to cleanliness and compulsive hand-washing. They report periods of heightened energy and impulsivity alternating with depressive episodes. Current treatment includes mood stabilizers lithium and exposure-response prevention therapy for OCD.

presentation

/in /by

 

  • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
  • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
  • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
  • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

MSN Discussion Posting

/in /by

General directions for the discussion:

There are two (2) questions for this discussion. Please choose one of the questions for your initial posting.

You are required to respond to at least one of your peers. You must respond to a different discussion question than the one you have answered.

You are also required to include a word count in parentheses (your question response must be between 300-500 words), excluding the original question and references. This word count is part of the Discussion Board Rubric.

Please note that there are two dates listed on the Course Schedule. The first is the due date for the initial posting and the second the completion date for the threaded response.

The due date listed here is for full completion of the module, including the threaded discussion. The DB be monitored to verify that the initial posting was completed on the date listed on the schedule.

Discussion Board 2 Questions

  1. Select an article on your Supplemental Reading list in Module 1.2 and answer the following questions:
  • How is the concept defined?
  • What is the empirical referent for the concept? Suggest ways the concept might be measured in your clinical setting. If the authors did not suggest ways of measuring the concept, create ways of measuring the concept based on the defining attributes of the concept.
  • What other information helps to illuminate the concept? e.g. case examples or exemplars, antecedents, consequences, synthesis, contrast.
  • What did the particular method of concept analysis add to your understanding of the concept? In other words, justify the use of the method — or consider how a different concept analysis method might have provided a different picture of the concept.
  • Provide an example of this concept from your practice. How does the conceptualization of the concept fit with your experience?
  • Does the concept analysis begin to suggest propositions or testable hypotheses? For instance, could you begin to say something like “This concept occurs when . . .” or “When this concept is present, then . . .”? Give examples, if possible. In other words, consider how this concept analysis might be the beginning of a theory.
  1. Considering the various levels of abstraction (Metaparadigm, Philosophy, Conceptual Model, Grand Theory, Middle Range Theory, Practice Theory), which do you see as most appropriate to your nursing practice? Why? Or could you argue for a time and place for each level of abstraction?