s4,2

/in /by

Write 2-3 pages applicable to your capstone project. Identify the stakeholders (use fictitious names for stakeholders) that will play a major part with your study and integrate with your project.

Topics to include:

  1. Roles of stakeholders
  2. Identify your stakeholders – are they supportive to your project?
  3. List of stakeholders who will be interested in the results of your project
  4. Promoting stakeholder participation
  5. Possible concerns/barriers from stakeholders
  6. Strategies that you will use to gain support and assistance from your stakeholders

Expectations

  • US sources and topic is (nurse retention).
  • Length: 2-3  pages
  • Format: APA 7th ed.
  • Research: At least one peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years

NURSSING

/in /by

Nursing Cultural Wk 4 APA Assignment

/in /by

 Week Four APA Assignment: Evaluating the socioeconomic impact of healthcare across our diverse communities: Educating our clients regarding accessibility and affordability.

  • Sections of the assignment must include:
    Introduction
    Focus points covered in the discussion posts
    Any arguments and rationales for your stance
    Conclusion or Summary
  • The components of your APA Assignment includes the following:
    The assignment must be completed on a word document.
    Your APA  Assignment must include a title page (Refer to Purdue OWL).
    All in-text citations must be used when paraphrasing or quoting a previous author.
    All references must reflect the in-text citations used.
    All reference sources must be within the past 5 years unless it is the works of a nurse theorist or a significant reference material.
    The length of the assignment must be 750-1000 words. Please pay attention to spelling and grammar. Points are deducted for repeat offenders.
    Upon completion of the assignment, you must submit it via Turnitin.com and please note that your plagiarism score should be no more than 20%. If you score higher, please make adjustments

Health promotion case study

/in /by

Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed.

Citation and references

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 3: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH

/in /by

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 3: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). 
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

· Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–228)

· Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. 


American Journal of Nursing

Links to an external site.
, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c

· Fineout-Overhold, E., Melnyk, B.M., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II. 


American Journal of Nursing

Links to an external site.
, 110(7), 47-52

· Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III the process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence.

American Journal of NursingLinks to an external site.
, 110(11), 43-51. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5

· Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. 

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationLinks to an external site.
, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733

·

Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)

Describe two cognitive techniques and two behavioral techniques. In what types of situations would you choose each?

/in /by

Describe two cognitive techniques and two behavioral techniques. In what types of situations would you choose each? 

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. 

The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner. 

Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%

Advance nursing assessment

/in /by

 female who presents to the office with c/o wound to her left foot  

What is risk

/in /by

What is risk

pn 2 concept map

/in /by

 

T.J., a 30-year-old African American client, is in his last year of law school and is clerking for a prestigious law firm. He and his fiancé plan to marry as soon as he graduates. During the last week he has had four dizzy spells and a headache at the base of his skull upon awakening for the last 2 days. His father has a history of hypertension, so T.J. is aware that his symptoms may indicate high blood pressure. On his way home from work, T.J. stops by the clinic and asks the nurse to check his blood pressure. The nursing assessment yields the following data.

Subjective data: States he has had four dizzy spells and has awakened with a headache in the occipital lobe the last two mornings. T.J. has 1 glass of wine at lunch and 2-3 beers in the evening to relax from the tension of school and work. Most of his meals are at fast-food establishments and have a high fat content. T.J. does not smoke. He used to jog 4 mornings a week but quit when he started clerking. He has had nocturia for the last 3 weeks. He is not taking any medication. T.J. states he is concerned about having hypertension because he does not want to take medication.