Unit 3 Ion Channels. Discussion and peer response. 1300w. APA. 4 references total due 9-15-23.

Advanced Psychopharmacology and Health Promotion

Unit 3 Ion Channels. Discussion and peer response. 1300w. APA. 4 references total due 9-15-23.

Review the link. https://youtu.be/VPJG_hy72m8


Initial Response


Unit 3 discussion APA. 800W.

Instructions:

1. Compare and contrast the two different major classes of ion channels.

2. Explain the difference between full agonists, partial agonists, antagonists, inverse agonists.

3. Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format.


Peer Response


section APA 500W.

Instructions:

Please read and respond to at least two of your peers' initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers:

1. Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.

2. How are they similar or how are they different?

3. What information can you add that would help support the responses of your peers?

4. Ask your peers a question for clarification about their post.

5. What most interests you about their responses?

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Studying for the Boards

Please see the attachment for instructions

reply

Thank you for your post! I want to clarify the interval and ratio level of measurements.

Feedback and Question: In statistics, measurements having starting points are classified as ratio levels of measurement.

Do you know if blood pressure readings are measured starting from zero and cannot go below zero, with zero being the baseline? I recommend watching this YouTube video to learn about the types of data and levels of measurement. I'd love to hear your thoughts after watching it. Thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPHYPXBK_ks

Last Discussion 8

 

Go back to the discussion topic in Week 1 and review your discussion posts.

Have any of your thoughts or concepts of trends in nursing have changed since week 1.  Please share specific examples.

BELOW IS MY POST FROM WEEK 1:

 

When I think of issues and trends in nursing, I think of how there are constant changes in the management of patients and healthcare facilities based on the prevailing social, technological and economic changes. Issues and trends in nursing are patterns, development and changes that occur in the healthcare sectors to enhance the delivery of care services. Nursing issues and trends encompass a wide range of issues depending on the challenges the nursing sector faces at a particular time.

Issues and trends have affected nursing regulations and policies, particularly in the United States. Constant amendments and changes of policies and laws affecting nurses are crucial to ensure that healthcare personnel work within the framework of the law. The national, state and country are changed to fit international laws and policies. Nurses across the globe should be updated on the current issues and trends in nursing policies and regulations to comply with patient care.

Due to technological advancement, nurses must continue implementing new technologies to enhance data storage and real-time retrieval of patients’ medical care to facilitate care based on evidence-based information. The current trends in implementing advanced technologies in the nursing sector are in the right direction. For instance, implementing electronic health records (EHR) has improved communication and collaboration between nurses, particularly during patient complications and medical errors through the Internet.

I understand that the nursing sector is dynamic and influenced by other factors such as social, economic and politics of not only countries but the entire world. In this regard, nurses keep changing their methods, laws, policies, and techniques to handle patient challenges. 

week5 political science

Representation in Congress

Assignment

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

· Textbook: Chapter 11, 12

· Lesson

· Minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

Instructions

Research the proportion of women, African Americans, Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans and openly gay or lesbian members of Congress.

1. Reflect on what these patterns say about the nature of representation.

2. Why do some groups tend to be underrepresented in Congress?

3. Why do you see a trend in which more women and minorities are being represented?

4. Do you think the underrepresentation of women and minorities affect Congress's business?

5. How might we as a people address this situation and strive towards equal representation? Make sure to cite sources used.

Requirements

· Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)

· 1-inch margins

· Double spaced

· 12-point Times New Roman font

· Title page

· References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited)

Ebook:
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780135246849/pageid/11

The Struggle for Democracy, 2018 Elections and Updates Edition

Or
[email protected]

PWD: Bryanthierry@09

Urinary Tract Infection 9 years old

  

Instructions: Select one of the topic mentioned below and discuses filling the attached form.

Topics: 

Urinary Tract Infection 9 years old

Requirements

Ø The discussion must address the topic

Ø Rationale must be provided

Ø Use at least 600 words (no included 1st page or references in the 600 words)

Ø May use examples from your nursing practice

Ø Formatted and cited in current APA 7

Ø Use 3 academic sources, not older than 5 years. Not Websites are allowed.

Ø Plagiarism is NOT permitted

Assessment-2-4040

Assessment 2

Protected Health Information (PHI): Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Best Practices

Instructions- Prepare a 2-page interprofessional staff update on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.

Introduction- Health care providers today must develop their skills in mitigating risks to their patients and themselves related to patient information. At the same time, they need to be able distinguish between effective and ineffective uses of social media in health care.

This assessment will require you to develop a staff update for the interprofessional team to encourage team members to protect the privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient information.

Preparation- As you begin to consider the assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI) activity. The activity will support your success with the assessment by creating the opportunity for you to test your knowledge of potential privacy, security, and confidentiality violations of protected health information. The activity is not graded and counts towards course engagement.

To successfully prepare to complete this assessment, complete the following:

· Review the infographics on protecting PHI provided in the resources for this assessment, or find other infographics to review. These infographics serve as examples of how to succinctly summarize evidence-based information.

· Analyze these infographics and distill them into five or six principles of what makes them effective. As you design your interprofessional staff update, apply these principles. 
Note: In a staff update, you will not have all the images and graphics that an infographic might contain. Instead, focus your analysis on what makes the messaging effective.

· Select from any of the following options, or a combination of options, the focus of your interprofessional staff update:

· Social media best practices.

· What not to do: social media.

· Social media risks to patient information.

· Steps to take if a breach occurs.

· Conduct independent research on the topic you have selected in addition to reviewing the suggested resources for this assessment. This information will serve as the source(s) of the information contained in your interprofessional staff update. Consult the 

BSN Program Library Research Guide
 for help in identifying scholarly and/or authoritative sources.

Instruction- In this assessment, assume you are a nurse in an acute care, community, school, nursing home, or other health care setting. Before your shift begins, you scroll through Facebook and notice that a coworker has posted a photo of herself and a patient on Facebook. The post states, “I am so happy Jane is feeling better. She is just the best patient I’ve ever had, and I am excited that she is on the road to recovery.”

You have recently completed your annual continuing education requirements at work and realize this is a breach of your organization's social media policy. Your organization requires employees to immediately report such breaches to the privacy officer to ensure the post is removed immediately and that the nurse responsible receives appropriate corrective action.

You follow appropriate organizational protocols and report the breach to the privacy officer. The privacy officer takes swift action to remove the post. Due to the severity of the breach, the organization terminates the nurse.

Based on this incident's severity, your organization has established a task force with two main goals:

· Educate staff on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.

· Prevent confidentiality, security, and privacy breaches.

The task force has been charged with creating a series of interprofessional staff updates on the following topics:

· Social media best practices.

· What not to do: Social media.

· Social media risks to patient information.

· Steps to take if a breach occurs.

You are asked to select one or more of the topics and create the content for a staff update containing a 
maximum of two content pages. 
This assessment is not a traditional essay.
 It is a staff educational update about PHI. Consider creating a flyer, pamphlet, or one PowerPoint slide (not an entire presentation). Remember it should not be more than two pages (excluding a title and a reference page).

The task force has asked team members assigned to the topics to include the following content in their updates in addition to content on their selected topics:

· What is protected health information (PHI)?

· Be sure to include essential HIPAA information.

· What are privacy, security, and confidentiality?

· Define and provide examples of privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns related to the use of technology in health care.

· Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

· What evidence relating to social media usage and PHI do interprofessional team members need to be aware of? For example:

· What are some examples of nurses being terminated for inappropriate social media use in the United States?

· What types of sanctions have health care organizations imposed on interdisciplinary team members who have violated social media policies?

· What have been the financial penalties assessed against health care organizations for inappropriate social media use?

· What evidence-based strategies have health care organizations employed to prevent or reduce confidentiality, privacy, and security breaches, particularly related to social media usage?

Notes

· Your staff update is limited to two double-spaced content pages. Be selective about the content you choose to include in your update so you can meet the page length requirement. Include 
need-to-know information. Omit 
nice-to-know information.

· Many times people do not read staff updates, do not read them carefully, or do not read them to the end. Ensure your staff update piques staff members' interest, highlights key points, and is easy to read. Avoid overcrowding the update with too much content.

· Also, supply a separate reference page that includes two or three peer-reviewed and one or two non-peer-reviewed resources (for a total of 3–5 resources) to support the staff update content.

·
Additional Requirements-
Written communication: Ensure the staff update is free from errors that detract from the overall message.

·
Submission length: Maximum of two double-spaced content pages.

·
Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point.

·
Citations and references: Provide a separate reference page that includes 2–3 current, peer-reviewed and 1–2 current, non-peer-reviewed in-text citations and references (total of 3–5 resources) that support the staff update's content. Current 
means no older than 5 years.

·
APA format: Be sure your citations and references adhere to APA format. Consult the 

Evidence and APA
 page for an APA refresher.

Context- Health professionals today are increasingly accountable for the use of protected health information (PHI). Various government and regulatory agencies promote and support privacy and security through a variety of activities. Examples include:

· Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR).

· Provision of EHR incentive programs through Medicare and Medicaid.

· Enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules.

· Release of educational resources and tools to help providers and hospitals address privacy, security, and confidentiality risks in their practices.

Technological advances, such as the use of social media platforms and applications for patient progress tracking and communication, have provided more access to health information and improved communication between care providers and patients.

At the same time, advances such as these have resulted in more risk for protecting PHI. Nurses typically receive annual training on protecting patient information in their everyday practice. This training usually emphasizes privacy, security, and confidentiality best practices such as:

· Keeping passwords secure.

· Logging out of public computers.

· Sharing patient information only with those directly providing care or who have been granted permission to receive this information.

Today, one of the major risks associated with privacy and confidentiality of patient identity and data relates to social media. Many nurses and other health care providers place themselves at risk when they use social media or other electronic communication systems inappropriately. For example, a Texas nurse was recently terminated for posting patient vaccination information on Facebook. In another case, a New York nurse was terminated for posting an insensitive emergency department photo on her Instagram account.

Competencies Measured- By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Describe nurses' and the interdisciplinary team's role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

· Describe the security, privacy, and confidentially laws related to protecting sensitive electronic health information that govern the interdisciplinary team.

· Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

· Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.

· Identify evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks to patients and health care staff related to sensitive electronic health information.

· Develop a professional, effective staff update that educates interprofessional team members about protecting the security, privacy, and confidentiality of patient data, particularly as it pertains to social media usage.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

· Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

· Create a clear, concise, well-organized, and professional staff update that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Protected Health Information (PHI): Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Best Practices Scoring Guide

CRITERIA

Describe the security, privacy, and confidentially laws related to protecting sensitive electronic health information that govern the interdisciplinary team.

Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

Identify evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks to patients and health care staff related to sensitive electronic health information.

Develop a professional, effective staff update that educates interprofessional team members about protecting the security, privacy, and confidentiality of patient data, particularly as it pertains to social media usage.

Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

Create a clear, concise, well-organized, and professional staff update that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.



ANALYSIS OF A PERTINENT HEALTHCARE ISSUE

Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Module at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436534)

The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare.
Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on
outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease
management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention
delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing
the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field
has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve
multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing
population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the
rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an
industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further
review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your
organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

ANALYSIS OF A PERTINENT HEALTHCARE
ISSUE

RESOURCES

To Prepare:

Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the
national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national
healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module)
that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected
national healthcare issue/stressor.

The Assignment (2-3 Pages):

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Develop a 2 to 3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected
national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the
following:

Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization.
Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or
appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national
healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other
organizations.
Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare
issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact
your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

Looking Ahead

The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the Assignment
instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.

Submit your paper.

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436547)

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 2

Criteria Ratings Pts

25 pts

30 pts

Develop a 2-3 page paper,
written to your
organization's leadership
team, addressing the
selected national
healthcare issue/stressor
and how it is impacting
your work setting. Be sure
to address the following: ·
Describe the national
healthcare issue/stressor
you selected and its
impact on your
organization. · Use
organizational data to
quantify the impact (if
necessary, seek
assistance from leadership
or appropriate
stakeholders in your
organization).

25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent

The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization.
…The response
includes
accurate, clear,
and detailed
evidence/data to
quantify the
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

22 to >19.0 pts
Good

The response
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization.
…The response
includes
accurate data to
quantify the
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

19 to >17.0 pts
Fair

The response
inaccurately or
vaguely
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization.
…The response
includes vague
or inaccurate
data to quantify
the impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

17 to >0 pts
Poor

The response
inaccurately
and vaguely
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and
its impact on
an organization
or is missing.
…The
response
includes vague
and inaccurate
data to quantify
the impact of
the national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or is
missing.· Provide a summary of the

two articles you reviewed
from outside resources, on
the national healthcare
issue/stressor. · Explain
how the healthcare
issue/stressor is being
addressed in other
organizations.

30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent

Response
includes a
complete,
detailed, and
specific
summary of two
outside
resources
(articles)
reviewed on the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately and
thoroughly
explains in detail
how the
healthcare

26 to >23.0 pts
Good

Response
includes an
accurate
summary of two
outside
resources
(articles)
reviewed on the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
explains how the
healthcare
issue/stressor is
being addressed
in other
organizations.

23 to >20.0 pts
Fair

Response
includes a vague
or inaccurate or
incomplete
summary of
outside
resources
(articles)
reviewed on the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
vaguely or
inaccurately
explains how the
healthcare
issue/stressor is
being addressed

20 to >0 pts
Poor

Response
provides a
vague and
inaccurate
summary of
outside
resources
(articles)
reviewed on
the national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
summary is
missing. …The
response
vaguely and
inaccurately
explains how
the healthcare

Criteria Ratings Pts

25 pts

5 pts

issue/stressor is
being addressed
in other
organizations.

in other
organizations.

issue/stressor
is being
addressed in
other
organizations
or explanation
is missing.

· Summarize the strategies
used to address the
organizational impact of
national healthcare
issues/stressors presented
in the scholarly resources
you selected. · Explain
how the strategies may
impact your organization
both positively and
negatively. Be specific and
provide examples.

25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Response
includes a
complete,
detailed, and
accurate
summary of the
strategies used
to address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor.
…Response
accurately and
thoroughly
explains how the
strategies may
impact an
organization
both positively
and negatively,
with specific and
accurate
examples for
each.

22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Response
includes an
accurate
summary of the
strategies used
to address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor.
…Response
explains how the
strategies may
impact an
organization
both positively
and negatively
with at least one
specific example
for each.

19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
Response
includes a vague
or inaccurate
summary of the
strategies used
to address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor.
…Response
vaguely or
inaccurately
explains how the
strategies may
impact an
organization
both positively
and negatively.
…Response may
include some
vague or
inaccurate
examples.

17 to >0 pts
Poor
Response
provides a
vague and
inaccurate
summary of the
strategies used
to address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
or summary is
missing.
…Response
vaguely and
inaccurately
explains how
the strategies
may impact an
organization
both positively
and negatively
or explanation
is missing.
…Response
does not
include any
examples.

Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at
least 2 outside
resources and 2
or 3 course-
specific
resources.

4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at
least 2 outside
resources and 1
course-specific
resource.

3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Using proper in-
text citations,
the response
minimally
integrates
outside and
course-specific
resources.

2 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
does not
integrate
outside and
course-
specific
resources or
no in-text
citations are
used.

Total Points: 100

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

5 pts

5 pts

Written Expression and
Formatting—Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that
support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused—neither
long and rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction
is provided, which
delineates all required
criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent

Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity. …A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided, which
delineates all
required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts
Good

Paragraphs and
sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 80%
of the time.
…Purpose,
introduction,
and conclusion
of the
assignment are
stated but are
brief and not
descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts
Fair

Paragraphs and
sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 60–
79% of the
time.
…Purpose,
introduction,
and conclusion
of the
assignment is
vague or off
topic.

2 to >0 pts
Poor

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity less
than 60% of
the time. …No
purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion is
provided.

Written Expression and
Formatting—English
Writing Standards: Correct
grammar, mechanics, and
proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent

Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts
Good

Contains a few
(one or two)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

3 to >2.0 pts
Fair

Contains
several (three
or four)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

2 to >0 pts
Poor

Contains many
(five or more)
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
errors that interfere
with the reader’s
understanding.

Written Expression and
Formatting: The paper
follows correct APA format
for title page, headings,
font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers, running head,
parenthetical/in-text
citations, and reference
list.

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent

Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts
Good

Contains a few
(one or two) APA
format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts
Fair

Contains several
(three or four)
APA format
errors.

2 to >0 pts
Poor

Contains many
(five or more)
APA format
errors.

discussion replies

Respond to the four colleagues and offer alternative views on the impact of patient preferences on treatment plans or outcomes, or the potential impact of patient decision aids on situations like the one shared. include two references each 

CONCEPT MAP (altered level of consciousness)

please see the attached files for details and instructions.