Journal entry
Paraphrazing this work for me.
Paraphrazing this work for me.
Goal: Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a personality disorder.
Content Requirements:
Format Requirements:
Submission Requirements
1. Describe the main concepts behind the theory of spiritual well-being in illness.
2. Provide a specific exemplar of a time when you, as a nurse, showed a ministry of care in your relationships with patients.
3. Provide an explanation of the caring elements you employed, such as prayer, care, touch.
4. Provide a description of the patient scenario and their response.
5. Provide a brief overview of your feelings on the scenario discussed, areas you perceived as your strengths and your weaknesses, and your plans for improving your ability to provide spiritual care.
Document this assignment in a 4 page word document, Include at least 5 articles published in last 5 years,
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 250–300 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Library Research Assignment
Discuss the following points regarding the evolution of total quality management concepts:
Create a 2-page reflection on your work and experiences in this course.
Doctoral-level health care professionals have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions to their field and organization. After completing any portion of a project, it is important to evaluate how well it met its objectives. Such evaluation enables practitioners and leaders to explore and reflect on their experiences and identify opportunities for future improvement.
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to reflect on your achievements, challenges, and improvement opportunities related to your work on your doctoral project and at your project site during this course. By reflecting on these areas, you can deepen your critical-thinking and problem-solving skills, as well as locate your position on your project journey as you progress to the next course.
One way you could organize your reflection is to take a simplified gap-analysis approach for each of the four main topics for the reflection:
· What happened?
. What did you do and what were the results of your work?
. Remember to mention the relevant evidence you used to guide your approach to your work.
· What went well?
· What did not go well?
. How did actual events differ from your predictions?
. If relevant, mention the evidence that helped you formulate your prediction about what should have happened.
· How are your experiences changing your thinking, analysis, and communication patterns?
. How can you use this information to improve?
. If relevant, look to the literature to support your potential changes.
While you may use any appropriate approach to organize your reflection, be sure that you address the following scoring guide criteria
:
· Reflect on process, outcomes, success, and opportunities for improvement related to the development of your QI/PI framework.
· Reflect on process, outcomes, success, and opportunities for improvement related to the development of your project implementation plan and logic model.
· Reflect on process, outcomes, success, and opportunities for improvement related to collaboration and other relevant work at the project site.
· Integrate support from scholarly and authoritative sources to strengthen claims and substantiate decision making.
Identify an article that is at least five years old. Summarize the statistical findings and discuss the significant it has on nursing.
Please post your initial post with 400 words and one scholarly article.Attached you can find the rubric to following
Taking into account internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate mid-range theories or their use in research. critique Self-Efficacy theory using the internal and external critique evaluation process.
Iron Deficiency anemia
1. The week’s topics were choosen from the following website:
Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityLinks to an external site.
2. Reply to the following prompt:
·
· Describe the diagnostic or screening tool selected, its purpose, and what age group it targets.
· Has it been specifically tested in this age group?
· Next, discuss the predictive ability of the test. For instance, how do you know the test is reliable and valid? What are the reliability and validity values? What are the predictive values? Is it sensitive to measure what it has been developed to measure, for instance, HIV, or depression in older adults, or Lyme disease? Would you integrate this tool into your advanced practice based on the information you have read about the test, why or why not?
3. You should include a minimum of two (2) scholarly articles from the last five (5) years (3 is recommended).
4. Your work should have in-text citations integrating at a minimum one scholarly article and the course textbook. APA format should be utilized to include a reference list. Correct grammar, spelling, and APA should be adhered to when writing, work should be scholarly without personalization or first – person use.
Pediatric Chronic Illness Management Toolkit: Create a comprehensive toolkit that provides resources and strategies for managing chronic illnesses in pediatric patients, addressing topics like medication management, lifestyle adjustments, and psychosocial support.
Please see the attachment for the instructions