Nursing Assignment

Week 2 Ethical Health Promotion Paper

Find a scholarly, peer-reviewed article no more than four years old that discusses an ethical health promotion-related issue.

In your paper:

· Briefly summarize the presented issue.

· Describe your thoughts on the role health care professionals should play in resolving the ethical issue.

· Provide specific theories and refer to specific ethical codes to support your position.

Your paper should be 2–3 pages long. Use APA to cite and reference the article and any other optional sources you use. Adhere to APA formatting throughout your paper.

Rubric

NURS_561_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric

NURS_561_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >31.6 pts

Meets Expectations

The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment.

31.6 to >23.6 pts

Approaches Expectations

The response to the assignment is generally adequate but may not be thorough.

23.6 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

The writer does not respond to the assignment.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail

30 to >23.7 pts

Meets Expectations

There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.

23.7 to >17.7 pts

Approaches Expectations

There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information.

17.7 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

The topic and main ideas are not clear.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20 to >15.8 pts

Meets Expectations

The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong.

15.8 to >11.8 pts

Approaches Expectations

The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included.

11.8 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA

10 to >7.9 pts

Meets Expectations

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

7.9 to >5.9 pts

Approaches Expectations

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

5.9 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

R1 see attachment

Make a follow-up of a student's weekly discussion and respond with your opinion regarding to her post

——You don't have to post this in APA format necessarily, it's just giving feedback to the student .



Claire Steininger

Identify and describe practice barriers for all four APNs' roles in your state and discuss these barriers on a state and national level. The four roles include the nurse midwife, nurse anesthetist, nurse practitioner, and clinical nurse specialist.

Nurse midwives often struggle with scope of practice limitations and the necessity for collaborative agreements, which can sometimes disrupt their ability to provide comprehensive care. Nurse anesthetists may face restrictions, such as supervision requirements and inconsistent reimbursement policies, limiting their autonomy in anesthesia care. Nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists confront barriers like collaborative agreements and scope of practice restrictions, which can affect their capacity to deliver primary and specialized care independently. These state-level obstacles are further complicated by variations in laws and regulations across the country. At the national level, lack of consistency and autonomy make it challenging for APNs to provide consistent, high-quality healthcare (Peterson, 2018).

Identify forms of competition on the state and national level that interfere with APNs' ability to practice independently.

At the state level, one form of competition arises from established healthcare hierarchies and interests. Physicians' groups and medical associations often lobby for laws and regulations that restrict APN autonomy to protect their traditional roles in healthcare. With a limited scope of practice, APNs are sometimes forced to adhere to physician regulations. On the national level, Medicare reimbursement rates and federal funding allocations can be influenced by powerful stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, insurance providers, and large healthcare systems. These sources may advocate for regulations that favor their interests instead of that of others (Galvani et al., 2020).

Identify the specific lawmakers by name at the state level (i.e., key members of the state's legislative branch and executive branch of government)

In Florida, the governor Ron DeSantis, is the head of the executive branch. Jeanette Nunez is the lieutenant governor, Ashley Moody is the attorney general, Jimmy Patronis is the chief financial officer, and Wilton Simpson is the agricultural commissioner. On the legislative side, the senate president is Kathleen Passidomo, the house speaker is Paul Renner, the majority leader for the senate is Ben Albritton and for the house is Michael Grant. Lastly, the minority leader for the senate is Lauren Book and for the house is Fentrice Driskell (BallotPedia, 2022).

Discuss interest groups that exist at the state and national levels that influence APN policy.

At the state level, physician groups often advocate for policies that maintain their traditional roles and may oppose measures that grant APNs greater autonomy. Oppositely, nursing associations like the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) work to advance APN practice, pushing for full scope of practice and reimbursement policy changes to enhance access to care. On the national level, there are also national nursing organizations like the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) and the National Council of Nurse Practitioners (NCNP) that actively advocate for APN policy changes that can promote independent practice (Brom et al., 2018).

Discuss methods used to influence change in policy in forms of competition, state legislative and executive branches of government, and interest groups.

Some methods used to influence change in policy include political campaigns and quality and safety initiatives. Supporting candidates who are sympathetic to APN issues and policy changes through campaign contributions and grassroots mobilization can influence election outcomes, ultimately affecting the composition of legislative and executive branches. APNs can also participate in quality and safety initiatives to demonstrate a commitment to high-quality care and patient well-being can enhance their credibility and influence (Cullerton et al., 2018).

 

 

BallotPedia. (2022). 
Florida's State Legislature. ballotpedia. 

https://ballotpedia.org/Links to an external site.

Brom, H. M., Salsberry, P. J., & Graham, M. C. (2018). Leveraging health care reform to accelerate nurse practitioner full practice authority. 
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
30(3), 120–130. 

https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000023Links to an external site.

Cullerton, K., Donnet, T., Lee, A., & Gallegos, D. (2018). Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model. 
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
15(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0716-y


Links to an external site.

Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2020). Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA. 
Lancet (London, England)
395(10223), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33019-3

Peterson M. E. (2018). Barriers to Practice and the Impact on Health Care: A Nurse Practitioner Focus. 
Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology
8(1), 74–81.

 Reply

Week 4 Literature review

After identifying the articles to be used in your literature review, conduct a critical analysis of each article and summarize the findings. The literature you choose should support your proposed
intervention. 

CMHA

.
Assignment A Rubric

1-
Criteria

Identify and describe key issue and population

Mark (30%)

Provides a near flawless, succinct, accurate and well referenced outline of the problem / issue

2-
Criteria

Proposal for policy / legislative change to address problem.

Mark (40%)

Policy changes well-articulated, realistic and provides exemplary knowledge of mental health system

3-
Criteria

Anticipated change in outcomes as a result of policy change.

Mark (10%)

Excellent precis of measurable outcomes articulated as a consequence of policy change

4-
Criteria

Writing

Mark (20%)

Excellent academic writing style. It is very well organised and contains no spelling, grammar or referencing errors.

Excellent choice and integration of evidence. Adheres almost flawlessly to APA citing style.

Health Assessment

 Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

Nursing homework help

Explore one of the agencies for quality improvement listed in this module's lecture. Write a one-page summary of what the agency does, who it affects, and how it is utilized.

W3 Self assesment

please follow all directions

Enhancing Quality and Safety

Assignment help

see below

see below

MSN 5300 REPLIES

 reply with 200 words and reference

When discussing Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research we think of three distinct yet interconnected research paradigms employed across various disciplines. These approaches differ in philosophical foundations, data collection techniques, and analytical methods while sharing a joint commitment to rigorous research. It is essential to draw upon recent scholarly resources published within the past three years to elucidate the differences and similarities among these methodologies.

Quantitative research is characterized by its emphasis on the numerical data and the statistical analysis to get conclusions and make generalizations (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). Researchers in quantitative studies employ structured surveys, questionnaires, and experiments to collect data from a sizable sample size. Statistical techniques like regression analysis and hypothesis testing are commonly utilized to analyze quantitative data. The hallmark of quantitative research lies in its objectivity and the ability to establish causal relationships and trends within a population.

Qualitative research, on the other hand, focuses on understanding the depth and nuances of human experiences and perspectives (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). Qualitative researchers gather non-numerical data through interviews, observations, and open-ended surveys. The analysis involves thematic coding and content analysis to identify patterns, themes, and meanings within the data. Qualitative research offers a rich and holistic exploration of a phenomenon, often uncovering insights that quantitative methods may miss.

Mixed methods research represents an integration of both quantitative and qualitative approaches within a single study (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). The mixed methods is used by researchers to take the strengths of both paradigms to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their research questions. Data collection and analysis can occur sequentially or concurrently, with findings integrated at various stages. This approach enhances the triangulation of results and allows researchers to explore complex research questions from multiple angles (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018)

While these three research methodologies exhibit fundamental differences, they also share similarities. All of the three approaches adhere to systematic research methods, are committed to ethical conduct (American Psychological Association, 2020), and require rigorous data analysis. Additionally, they contribute to advancing knowledge within their respective fields, each offering unique insights and perspectives.

In conclusion, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research studies are distinct but complementary approaches to research. They differ in data collection, analysis, and philosophical underpinnings while sharing a dedication to sound research practices. Researchers choose these methodologies based on their research questions and objectives, recognizing that each offers valuable contributions to the pursuit of knowledge.