Submission Instructions:
Find and review ten (10) scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles, meta-analyses, or CPGs in support of the practice change intervention. Complete the appropriate section in the worksheet for each article.
1. State the PICOT question.
2. For each article, supply the information for each of the seven headings for the appropriate article type.
3. Find and review ten (10) scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles, meta-analyses, or CPGs in support of the practice change intervention. Complete the appropriate section in the worksheet for each article.
4. State the PICOT question.
5. For each article, supply the information for each of the seven headings for the appropriate article type.
Use complete sentences to document findings.
Select the correct table for each of the ten articles and complete the information that aligns with the type of research article selected. You may do any combination of articles.
Copy and paste the tables as needed to classify your ten articles correctly.
|
PICOT Statement |
|
QUANTITATIVE STUDIES |
|
|
Full reference for article (APA 7th Ed.Format) |
|
|
DOI of article/ article link |
|
|
Problem-related to PICOT |
|
|
Methods |
|
|
Sample and Participants |
|
|
Major Findings/Conclusions |
|
|
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention |
|
QUALITATIVE STUDIES |
|
|
Full reference for article (APA 7th Ed.Format) |
|
|
DOI of article/ article link |
|
|
Purpose and Type of Research |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Data Collection Method |
|
|
Study Findings |
|
|
Key Findings/Themes |
|
|
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention |
|
Clinical Practice Guideline |
|
|
Full reference for article (APA 7th Ed.Format) |
|
|
DOI of article/ article link |
|
|
Purpose and Type of Research |
|
|
Systematic Review of Literature |
|
|
Stakeholders and Peer Review |
|
|
Study Findings related to PICOT |
|
|
Strength of Recommendations |
|
|
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention |
|
|
META-ANALYSIS STUDIES |
|
|
Full reference for article (APA 7th Ed.Format) |
|
|
DOI of article/ article link |
|
|
Purpose of Research Article |
|
|
Search Selection Method |
|
|
Meta-Analysis Model |
|
|
Consistency/Variation of Studies |
|
|
Summary of Findings |
The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team and law enforcement officials (when indicated), and effectively communicate with family members who are often overwhelmed in emergency situations. In their role, PMHNPs can ensure a smooth transition from emergency mental health care to follow-up care, and also bridge the physical–mental health divide in healthcare.
In this week’s Assignment, you explore legal and ethical issues surrounding psychiatric emergencies, and identify evidence-based suicide and violence risk assessments.
TO PREPARE
· Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about psychiatric emergencies and the ethical and legal issues surrounding these events.
THE ASSIGNMENT
In 2–3 pages, address the following:
· Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released.
· Explain the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state.
· Explain the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts.
· Select one of the following topics, and explain one legal issue and one ethical issue related to this topic that may apply within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies: patient autonomy, EMTALA, confidentiality, HIPAA privacy rule, HIPAA security rule, protected information, legal gun ownership, career obstacles (security clearances/background checks), and payer source.
· Identify one evidence-based suicide risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.
· Identify one evidence-based violence risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.
Develop a 4-page quality/performance improvement framework for your doctoral project.
Quality/performance improvement (QI/PI) frameworks are used to establish and evaluate processes in practice. The most common models for such a framework are Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) and Six Sigma Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC). The purpose of this assessment is to use key information from your project charter to develop a QI/PI framework from which you will begin developing a project implementation plan and logic model in the next assessment.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
· Competency 1: Align the project charter with a continuous improvement model.
1. Describe the current practice needing improvement.
1. Explain how QI/PI data will be collected and analyzed.
1. Describe the proposed QI/PI changes and expected outcomes.
1. Explain how changes in quality or performance will be evaluated.
1. Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
Is about reducing falls in a primary care clinic with the implementation of a fall risk management protocol, now the clinic doesn’t use any protocol.
Develop a quality/performance improvement (QI/PI) framework for your project, aligned with your project charter. Choose a model for your framework, using the PDCA or DMAIC model, a model used in your organization, or another familiar reputable model that is suitable for your project. PDCA or DMAIC model information and examples are included in Resources.
Provide a succinct, scholarly narrative that reflects the content of your model and addresses the key points outlined below:
Each of the main tasks corresponds to scoring guide criteria. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
· Describe the current practice needing improvement.
1. What is the problem and its root cause?
1. What is the gap between what is and what should be?
1. What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
· Describes a QI/QP framework that will support and guide the project.
2. What do you need to accomplish to meet the project objectives and outcomes?
2. What formative assessments will help you ensure that the project is on course?
2. Which framework will assist you in guiding the entire project?
· Explain how QI/PI data will be collected and analyzed.
3. What data is needed?
3. How will you record and organize collected data?
3. What are appropriate data analysis methods for the type of data you will be collecting?
· Describe proposed QI/PI changes and expected outcomes.
4. What are appropriate measures for determining actual improvement?
4. How feasible are the proposed changes and what are the relevant contextual factors that can affect expected outcomes?
· Explain how changes in quality or performance will be evaluated.
5. What evaluation tools or methods will you use?
5. What criteria will you use to evaluate outcomes?
· Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
6. Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
6. Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards.
6. Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your introduction.
· Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
Resources
To Prepare:
Respond at least 2 times each . The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients. Provide a response to 1 of the 3 discussion prompts that your colleagues provided in their video presentations. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient.
First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the scope of psychotherapy. Second, explain how this week’s discussion aligns with the following APNA standard:
. Two scholarly source references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric: Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion and the role-specific competencies as applicable. (10%)
** Read the document, NCLEX-RN Test Plan version (April 2023) pdf that is posted below.
Respond to the following:
Question will be posted in chat
Describe how racial/health disparities, health equality/inequality and social justice/injustice could apply to the community you reside in, provide one specific example of how you will make a change in nursing practice regrading wound care.
