Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test.

Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment.

 Amy, a 3 year old girl is brought to your office by her mother because she has a fever and complains that her ear hurts. She has no significant medical history. The child is not pleased to be in the provider’s office and has been crying. Her mother explains that she developed a “cold” about 3 days ago with sniffles. As she cries she continues to cough and has yellowish nasal discharge.  

Attention………Remember that your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

Case:

A 16-year-old boy comes to clinic with chief complaint of sore throat for 3 days. Denies fever or chills. PMH negative for recurrent colds, influenza, ear infections or pneumonias. NKDA or food allergies. Physical exam reveals temp of 99.6 F, pulse 78 and regular with respirations of 18. HEENT normal with exception of reddened posterior pharynx with white exudate on tonsils that are enlarged to 3+. Positive anterior and posterior cervical adenopathy. Rapid strep test performed in office was positive. His HCP wrote a prescription for amoxicillin 500 mg po q 12 hours x 10 days disp #20. He took the first capsule when he got home and immediately complained of swelling of his tongue and lips, difficulty breathing with audible wheezing. 911 was called and he was taken to the hospital, where he received emergency treatment for his allergic reaction.

Post an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:

· The role genetics plays in the disease.

· Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described.

· The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred.

· The cells that are involved in this process.

· How another characteristic (e.g., gender, genetics) would change your response.

Hi, at least 3 references, free of plagiarism and APA format, plus introduction

·
List three questions you might ask the patient if she were in your office. Provide a rationale for why you might ask these questions.

When assessing this patient, it's important to ask questions that will help the provider understand the underlying causes and potential treatment options. Given the patient's recent loss and significant life changes, it's crucial to approach the assessment with sensitivity. Here are three questions I'd like to ask, along with their rationales:

1. Have you observed any changes in your sleep pattern, mood, or feelings since your husband passed away?

Rationale: This question allows the patient to provide insight into the nature and duration of her sleep disturbances and changes in her mood or feelings. Understanding the onset and progression of depression symptoms can related to her recent bereavement following her husband's passing.

2. Could you describe your emotions and have you ever experienced thoughts of self-harm or suicide?

Rationale: This question aims to comprehend a person's emotional state and evaluate the presence of suicidal thoughts or self-harm ideation. It's important to ask such questions without delay in treatment. Since the patient has a history of major depressive disorder (MDD), and her depression has worsened, it's crucial to explore her emotional state.

3. How have you been coping with the loss of your husband, and have you sought support or counseling to help you through this difficult time?

Rationale: Inquiring about coping strategies and support systems is essential for assessing the patient's resilience and identifying potential sources of assistance. Grief counseling or therapy can be invaluable in helping individuals navigate the complex emotions associated with loss. Additionally, it's important to assess whether the patient has been utilizing any resources to manage her depression.

·
Identify people in the patient's life you would need to speak to or get feedback from to further assess the patient's situation. Include specific questions you might ask these people and why.

To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's situation and evaluate her social support network, I would identify individuals in the patient's life, such as family members or close friends. Engaging in conversations with these individuals can be beneficial because they may have insights into the patient's emotional well-being and daily functioning. I would ask Questions like: “Could you please share any observations regarding alterations you may have noticed in the patient's behavior, mood, or sleep patterns following her husband's passing?” Family members and close friends are often the first to detect significant shifts in a person's behavior and emotional state. Their observations can offer valuable insights into the patient's emotional condition and the way the loss of her husband has affected her daily life.

·
Explain what, if any, physical exams, and diagnostic tests would be appropriate for the patient and how the results would be used.

In evaluating a 75-year-old patient with a chief complaint of insomnia and depression, diabetes (DM), and hypertension (HTN), a thorough assessment should include both physical exams and diagnostic tests: A physical examination should include checking blood pressure, heart rate, heart sounds, peripheral pulses, respiratory rate, and temperature. It should also involve assessing the patient's overall appearance and evaluating their general health.  In addition, assessing mental status, cognitive function, and neurological signs can help identify any neurological issues that may be contributing to sleep disturbances. Consider arranging a sleep study, also known as polysomnography (PSG). This medical test monitors various physiological functions while a person sleeps.

Diagnostic Tests include the following Blood Tests: Complete Blood Count (CBC) will check for anemia or other blood-related issues that can affect sleep and overall health; a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), assess kidney and liver function, electrolytes, and glucose levels; The HbA1c (Glycated Hemoglobin) test can monitor her long-term blood glucose control, can provide valuable insights into her diabetes management. The results of these exams and tests will inform a comprehensive treatment plan tailored to the patient's specific needs.

·
List a differential diagnosis for the patient. Identify the one that you think is most likely and explain why.

When assessing a patient with insomnia, along with chronic medical conditions like diabetes and hypertension, this patient likely has Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). She had no history of MDD before her husband's passing, and the current worsening of her depression may be attributed to his death. Although anxiety can cause insomnia problems, MDD with Bereavement seems most likely. However, we need to ensure there aren't other underlying causes, such as sleep problems or medical issues. To do that, we should conduct thorough assessments and laboratory tests. She needs to seek help from both her regular doctor and a mental health professional to find the right treatment and support.

·
List two pharmacologic agents and their dosing that would be appropriate for the patient's antidepressant therapy based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. From a mechanism of action perspective, provide a rationale for why you might choose one agent over the other.

When selecting pharmacologic agents for this 75-year-old patient, the choice of antidepressant therapy should consider pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Reduced kidney and liver function in elderly individuals can potentially affect both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

SSRIs, such as sertraline (Zoloft) and escitalopram (Lexapro), are two preferred for elderly patients. They are generally well-tolerated and have a lower risk of certain side effects, such as sedation or anticholinergic effects, which can be problematic for older adults. Sertraline (Zoloft) 150mg once daily or Escitalopram (Lexapro) 20 mg daily would be appropriate for this patient.

The patient has been taking Sertraline (Zoloft), her start dose was 100mg daily; increase slowly, no more than a maximum Dose of 200 mg once daily; sertraline increases serotonin levels and can be effective in treating depression. Escitalopram is considered perhaps the best-tolerated SSRI, with the fewest cytochrome P450 (CYP450)-mediated drug interactions. (Stahl, 2021). Escitalopram (Lexapro) 20 mg daily is also the appropriate choice.

·
For the drug therapy you select, identify any contraindications to use or alterations in dosing that may need to be considered based on ethical prescribing or decision-making. Discuss why the contraindication/alteration you identify exists. That is, what would be problematic with the use of this drug in individuals based on ethical prescribing guidelines or decision-making?

When prescribing antidepressant therapy, it's important to consider drug contraindications and alterations. For the selected antidepressant, escitalopram (Lexapro), don't use it with MAOIs or within 14 days after stopping an MAOI to prevent serotonin syndrome. This is a contraindication due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by agitation, confusion, rapid heart rate, and other symptoms. Escitalopram is primarily metabolized in the liver; it should be used with caution in patients with severe hepatic impairment or elderly with decreased liver function. In such cases, a lower initial dose and slower titration may be considered, as drug clearance may be reduced.

In all cases, ethical prescribing involves a thorough assessment of the patient's medical history, medication history, and potential contraindications. Dosing adjustments, when necessary, should be made to maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks and adverse effects.

·
Include any “checkpoints” (i.e., follow-up data at Week 4, 8, 12, etc.), and indicate any therapeutic changes that you might make based on possible outcomes that may happen given your treatment options chosen.

In depression treatment, scheduled follow-up appointments are vital for assessing progress, managing side effects, and adjusting treatment. Common intervals are every 4 weeks. At the checkpoint, like follow-up data at weeks 4, 8, 12, etc., make treatment decisions based on the patient's response, side effects, and goals. If there's significant improvement with few side effects, stick with the current dose. If there's limited improvement or major side effects, consider increasing the dose (if not already at the maximum) or trying a different antidepressant. In cases of long-term remission with a low risk of recurrence, think about tapering or discontinuing the medication.

At Week 4 (four weeks after initiating treatment), it's the time to evaluate the patient's initial response to medication. Inquire about changes in mood, sleep patterns, energy levels, and any side effects.

At Week 8 (eight weeks after starting treatment), it's time to reassess the patient's mood and overall well-being. Keep an eye on side effects, whether they're taking the medication as prescribed, any changes in their medical conditions, and any suicidal ideation.

At Week 12 (12 weeks after starting treatment), continue monitoring the patient's mood and how they're responding to treatment. Check for any signs that their depression might be coming back or getting worse.

Ongoing Follow-up (Regularly, every 3-6 months): Continue to monitor the patient's mental health, medication adherence, and any emerging side effects. Evaluate the need for ongoing treatment.

 

Reference:

Levenson JC, Kay DB, Buysse DJ. The pathophysiology of insomnia. Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):1179-1192. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1617. PMID: 25846534; PMCID: PMC4388122.

Stahl, S. M. (2021). Stahl's essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th Ed.) Cambridge University Press.

Lexapro Labeling-508; Reference ID: 4036381 https://www.fda.gov/media/135185/download

Assessment 4

Final Care Coordination Plan

INTRODUCTION- For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

INTRODUCTION-This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.

NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.

PREPARATION- You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.

In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of 
Healthy People 2030.

INSTRUCTIONS- Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.

For this assessment:

· Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.

Document Format and Length

Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.

Supporting Evidence

Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.

Grading Requirements

The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

· Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

· Address three health care issues.

· Design an intervention for each health issue.

· Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

· Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

· Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.

· Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

· Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

· Cite specific health policy provisions.

· Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

· Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.

· Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.

· Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Additional Requirements-Before submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.

Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course.

Context- Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.

Course Competencies- By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.

· Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

· Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.

· Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

· Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.

· Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.

· Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

· Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.

· Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

· Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Use the attached document to provide responses to the discussion board. please provide 2 scientific references in APA format.