Principles of Research and Evidence-Based Practice

/in /by

Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively implement them for advanced practice nurses.

Holistic Approach and Caring Science

/in /by

Please see the 2 attachments for the instructions 

Discusison Post-

/in /by

 Please answer the questions below.

  1. What must be included in the result and discussion section of the research assignment?
  2. Select a research result and state whether it includes the necessary elements. Why and why not?

Submission Instructions:

  • Post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

Case study week 10 MSN 5550

/in /by

 Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed.  

Please check for plagiarism and AI(artificial intelligence)

Attached you can find the case study.

Scholarly – Hypertension in Homeless

/in /by

PLease follow the “SCHOLARLY INSTRUCTIONS” for the instructions about it and build on all the other attachments for it

deductive

/in /by

Module 03 Content

1.

Top of Form

You are a Training Specialist hired by Universal Medical Supplies, Inc. This organization has been experiencing low productivity and errors in communication in the workplace. As part of an ongoing professional development series, the Vice President of the Human Resources department has tasked you with creating Critical Thinking training materials. The materials will be presented in many forms and by various means to help improve productivity and communication in the organization.

For a short training presentation during a regional meeting, you have been asked to create a 3- to 5-minute video presentation illustrating the differences between deductive and inductive argument.

Instructions

Use PowerPoint and a video recording program such as Screencast-O-Matic to create a training video that is 3-5 minutes in length and includes the following elements:

· Bullet points with brief text that outlines deductive reasoning.

· Bullet points with brief text that outlines inductive reasoning.

· Clip art or images to accompany your text. You may use characters, cartoons, drawing tools, or other technologies to be creative.

· Narration related to the bullet points to explain:

· The principles underlying both deductive and inductive reasoning.

· Clear examples of both deductive and inductive reasoning in a workplace setting.

· References to your sources at the end of the video.

Your PowerPoint

Slide 1) Title slide 

Slides 2-3) Deductive reasoning. You’ll want to provide an example or two. Talk about the value of deduction and why it’s useful. 

Slides 4-5) Inductive reasoning. Again, provide an example or two. Discuss the value of induction and how it is used. 

Slide 6) References. Yes, they count.

Bottom of Form

Fall Prevention

/in /by

due 09-9-23 @10am

WEEK8 5550

/in /by

Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed.  

discussion

/in /by

 

Discuss the safety and effectiveness of alternative and complementary medicine for the treatment of specific illness such as cancer, diabetes, hypertension,. Share your opinions about holistic and allopathic care. Would you have any conflicts or concerns supportinga patient who chooses holistic or allopathic medicine?

Post your post of 500 words with at least 2 scholarly references of less than 5 years old Using APAP 7th format

Nursing

/in /by

This week’s discussion is a two-fold discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the scope of psychotherapy. Second, explain how this week’s discussion aligns with the following APNA standard:

• Standard 5G: Therapeutic Relationship: Psychiatric-mental health registered nurse uses therapeutic relationship as the basis for interactions and the provision of care.

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m.

Eastern Time. Two scholarly source references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday day and posts at least two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board respectfully.

Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion and the role-specific competencies as applicable. (10%)

Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below five years old). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses and quality of response posts.

(20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)