Identify an article that is at least five years old. Summarize the statistical findings and discuss the significant it has on nursing.
Please post your initial post with 400 words and one scholarly article.Attached you can find the rubric to following
Taking into account internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate mid-range theories or their use in research. critique Self-Efficacy theory using the internal and external critique evaluation process.
Iron Deficiency anemia
1. The week’s topics were choosen from the following website:
Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityLinks to an external site.
2. Reply to the following prompt:
·
· Describe the diagnostic or screening tool selected, its purpose, and what age group it targets.
· Has it been specifically tested in this age group?
· Next, discuss the predictive ability of the test. For instance, how do you know the test is reliable and valid? What are the reliability and validity values? What are the predictive values? Is it sensitive to measure what it has been developed to measure, for instance, HIV, or depression in older adults, or Lyme disease? Would you integrate this tool into your advanced practice based on the information you have read about the test, why or why not?
3. You should include a minimum of two (2) scholarly articles from the last five (5) years (3 is recommended).
4. Your work should have in-text citations integrating at a minimum one scholarly article and the course textbook. APA format should be utilized to include a reference list. Correct grammar, spelling, and APA should be adhered to when writing, work should be scholarly without personalization or first – person use.
Pediatric Chronic Illness Management Toolkit: Create a comprehensive toolkit that provides resources and strategies for managing chronic illnesses in pediatric patients, addressing topics like medication management, lifestyle adjustments, and psychosocial support.
Please see the attachment for the instructions
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews-
Diabetes Type 1
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Diabetes Type 1
· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
References x 4 to include:
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
· Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 37–60)
· Chapter 3, “Finding Relevant Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions” (pp. 62–104)
Walden University Library. (n.d.-c).
Evidence-based practice research: CINAHL search helpLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/cinahlsearchhelp
Describe a clinical or research scenario that requires the use of a microscope. What microscope is the best choice for your scenario and why? What would be your second choice?
Identify a problem or concern from your selected population. Write a 1-3 page description of your problem and support the need to address this in your population with 3 evidence-based articles. Include title and reference page.
After studying the course materials located on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources page, answer the following:
Submission Instructions:
DUE SEPT. 3, 2023 @6PM
INSTRUCTIONS UPLOADED.
