wk4691B

1

This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your

previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If

you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next

writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write

about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If

you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One

week for this job.

Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your

previous writings.

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933

Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft

2

This week, you will bring together all of the assignments you have completed thus far,
and compose the rough draft of your change project paper. At this point, you will have
submitted each section and received feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous
assignment feedback should be evident. 
Your rough draft contains all of the expected
components of the final draft and is presented in APA format including a cover page,
references, and appendices when warranted. Your rough draft is your opportunity to
polish previously submitted assignments and combine the sections in a comprehensive
paper that show your change project is ready to be implemented.

You will take this time to identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in your change

project. Your rough draft should only require minor revisions before the final paper.

Your paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,

references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and

format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based
Change Project Paper Rubic (rough draft)

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper

Rubic (rough draft)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

The change project topic is introduced. All

background information is included. Project

importance within the field or significance

for the designated facility is described.

3.5
pts

3

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the

chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem

thoroughly, including the target population

description and history/background information

at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance

and applicability to nursing is included and well

presented. Includes an appropriate topic

identification related to an advanced practice

nursing issue or practice problem of concern.

Population is fully defined and present in the

research question. Includes specific interventions,

identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate

outcomes in a timely manner for the question.

Overall, the question is well-built using the PICOT

format.

3.5
pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed

articles, books, or limited non-research literature

(tool kits or standardized procedures) are present.

Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is

credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support

the main topic. In-text citations are present and

correctly formatted. Presents a thorough and

insightful analysis of significant findings related to

the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and

professionally sound and creative. Insightful and

comprehensive conclusions and solutions are

present.

3.5
pts

4

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are

well-developed. They are clear and thorough. Aims

include examples of projected features and

functions. Values include implementation benefits

for specific stakeholders. Desired outcomes state the

purpose, have a quality focus, and describe the

benefits that will occur as a result of

implementation.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies independent theories or conceptual models

that relate to the change project topic and describes

how they will be applied to the change project.

Thoroughly discusses how each element of the

phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly

applies each element of the theory to the elements

of the phenomenon under study. Develops the

rationale for the sample selection criteria, and

expertly discusses, analyzes, and critiques pertinent

research that uses the framework.

7 pts

5

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides keen insight into obstacles and proposes

sound, creative solutions or interventions based on

the literature review findings. Expertly compares

other views on the problem and solutions with detail.

Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in

the intervention and discusses implications for

clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the

implications of the change project and its significance

to the nursing profession and filling gaps in

knowledge. Accurately categorizes and thoroughly

explains specific methods of data collection to be

used. Explains in detail how data will be analyzed and

used. Provides a sound justification for subject

selection and sampling procedure. Accurately and

thoroughly describes potential limitations to data

collection and control.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion

10.5 to >8.61 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides an insightful and thorough summary of the

project, main points, and details the significance of

the project to the advanced practice nursing

profession. Provides detailed and creative

recommendations for future research and

implications for clinical practice. Discusses limitations

of the study in detail. Suggests specific directions for

future research. Insightfully considers changes in

theoretical construct and provides reasonable and

creative suggestions for public policy and/or changes

in educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical

framework to the overall product.

10.5
pts

6

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Rough
Draft

17.5 to >14.35 pts

Meets Expectations

Submission shows a concerted effort to present a

high-quality draft requiring minimal adjustments to

content and mechanics. All parts of the research

paper are submitted and efforts to integrate

feedback are highly apparent. Significant and

substantive improvements have been made to each

section of the paper.

17.5
pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA

10.5 to >8.61 pts

Meets Expectations

Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.

Information is well organized and clearly

communicated. The assignment is free of spelling and

grammatical errors. All the requirements related to

format, length, source citations, and layout are

followed. A complete reference page is included and

formatted using correct APA format. If applicable,

appendices and tables are complete and

appropriate.The

10.5
pts

Total Points: 70

7

  • Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft

Replies week 8 MSN 5300

  Replies two peers with 200 words each one 

1.Sensitivity and specificity are measures of the accuracy of a screening test that we use to identify the presence or absence of a particular condition in an individual.

Sensitivity measures the proportion of true positives that are correctly identified by a screening test. In other words, it tells us the percentage of people who have the condition and are correctly identified by the screening test as having it.

Specificity measures the proportion of true negatives that are correctly identified by a screening test. That is, it tells us the percentage of people who do not suffer from the condition and who the screening test correctly identifies as not suffering.

Both sensitivity and specificity are important in determining the accuracy of a screening test, as they inform us about how effective the test is in correctly identifying both positive and negative cases. Ideally, we want a screening test that has high sensitivity and specificity, so that we can accurately identify the presence or absence of the condition being tested.

There are several factors that can affect sensitivity and specificity:

The threshold or cutoff value used to define a positive screening result. The lower the threshold, the more sensitivity increases but specificity decreases, while a higher threshold increases specificity but decreases sensitivity.

Also important is the prevalence of the condition in the population tested. In a population with high prevalence, the positive predictive value of the test may be higher, while in a population with low prevalence, false positive results may be more common.

Characteristics of the population being tested, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, which may influence the accuracy of the test.

It is important to note that sensitivity and specificity are not absolute measures of a test’s accuracy, but rather represent a balance between correctly identifying true positives and true negatives. Therefore, the decision to use a particular screening test should be based on a thorough evaluation of its performance characteristics and its suitability for the population being screened.

Considering the aforementioned aspects of sensitivity and specificity, we will be able to accurately address research studies, achieving better results.

2. Building evidence-based practice requires difficult assessment of diagnostic tests and measures. Sensitivity and specificity are vital parameters in identifying the validity of this important study. Sensitivity measures the ability of a test to properly identify individuals with a specific condition, while specificity gauges the ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. Understanding these metrics is a fundamental advance study for healthcare and research settings for accurate disease identification and treatment planning. Sensitivity, also known as the true positive rate, measures the proportion of actual positives correctly identified by the test. High sensitivity ensures that individuals with the condition are unlikely to be missed, reducing the chances of false negatives. For instance, in cancer screening, a highly sensitive test detects can even detect early-stage of the cancers, leading to timely interventions and improved outcomes and like this be able to act. Sensitivity is crucial when early detection significantly influences patient prognosis, allowing for prompt medical intervention. On the other hand, specificity, or by other definition the true negative rate, reflects the proportion of individuals without the condition who are correctly identified by the test. High specificity minimizes false positives, confirming that healthy individuals are not unnecessarily subjected to further, potentially invasive, testing or treatments. For example, in HIV testing, high specificity is vital to prevent unnecessary emotional distress and healthcare costs resulting from false-positive results. Specificity is particularly important when a positive test result can lead to significant consequences, such as starting potent treatments or imposing lifestyle changes. There is often a difference between sensitivity and specificity. Increasing sensitivity may decrease specificity and vice versa, leading to a balance dilemma. Reaching to an optimal equilibrium is essential; too much focus on sensitivity might lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, while too much specificity might result in missed diagnoses. Applying the right balance will help individuals and it will and varies based on the medical condition, available treatments, and potential consequences of false results. 

     In summary, sensitivity and specificity are fundamental components in the screening aspects, tests playing a crucial role in evidence-based practice. Understanding and optimizing these parameters are imperative for clinicians and researchers, ensuring that diagnostic tests are trustworthy, leading to improved patient outcomes. By appreciating the balance between sensitivity and specificity, healthcare professionals can make informed choices, enhancing the quality of care and advancing evidence-based medicine.

Nutritional Principles in Nursing

Describing a Nutritional Assessment Tool

Module 05 Content

Find a dietary assessment tool that can be used either generally or for a specific alteration in health.


When you have found your assessment tool, answer the following questions:

What is the purpose of this tool?

Do you believe that the purpose is fulfilled based on the questions being asked? Why?

In what ways does the tool account for the individual perceptions and needs of the client?

Is there a nutritional history included? What does it cover?

Is the tool easy to use? Why or why not?

Does the tool provide enough information to determine next steps or interventions? Explain.

The writing assignment should be no more than 2 pages and APA Editorial Format must be used for citations and references used. Attach a copy of the assessment tool.

Week 2 Lab Report

BIOS242, Week 2-OL

Name:

Lab 2: Bacterial Isolation

Learning Objectives

· Explain the importance of bacterial growth for the investigation of pathological microorganisms

· Use aseptic techniques

· Explain the concept of a single colony

· Perform plate-streaking techniques

· Use selective media for isolation purposes

Techniques in Lab

· Colony screening

· Sterile technique

· Plate streaking

Introduction: Bacterial Isolation Virtual Simulation Lab
In the Bacterial Isolation simulation, you will investigate the cause of a contamination of poultry meat by a dangerous bacteria strain that is resistant to common antibiotics. After taking samples from the chicken farm, you will work in the virtual laboratory to isolate single colonies of the deadly bacteria among a variety of different species. To do so, you will learn how to work under sterile conditions, and you will be able to practice and perfect your plate streaking technique.

Identifying ampicillin resistant bacteria
The premise of the Bacterial Isolation lab is a report of ampicillin resistant bacteria in poultry meat. You will visit the place of origination, a chicken farm, in hopes of identifying the bacteria strain. The first task is to take a sample, which will contain a variety of bacterial strains, and from that, you must identify which strains are resistant to ampicillin by isolating single colonies.

Aseptic technique
In the Bacterial Isolation lab, you will learn how to use aseptic techniques—for example, remembering to turn on the Bunsen burner and sterile their loop in between streaks.

Plate streaking technique
In order to identify the specific bacteria strain, you will have to perform bacterial isolation using the plate streaking technique. There is an unlimited supply of agar plates, giving you the opportunity to practice this technique as many times as you like. Results are given immediately, as opposed to waiting a full 24 hours for incubation, as when performed in real life as opposed to in a virtual simulation. You will also streak a special Salmonella Shigella agar. The Salmonella Shigella agar contains a certain medium that only promotes growth of Gram-negative strains. Each of the different strains will exhibit a certain phenotype when grown on the Salmonella Shigella agar. By using this information you can identify the specific strain that is resistant to ampicillin. The sample will then be sent for further analysis to fully confirm the identity.

Will you be able to complete the task with your knowledge on bacterial isolation and successfully isolate the dangerous bacterial strain?

Questions:

1. Purpose: Please describe in complete sentences and in your own words, the purpose of this experiment.

2. Why is proper aseptic technique important in microbiology?

3. What is the importance of flaming the inoculating loop or needle before
and after each inoculation?

4. If you do not wait 10 – 20 seconds after flame sterilizing the inoculating instruments before obtaining the sample, what might be the consequences?

5. Why is it important to flame neck of the tubes immediately after uncapping and before recapping the tubes?

6. Reflection: Write 5 sentences on what you learned from this simulation, what did you like and what was something that you would not prefer to be in the simulation.

Grading Rubric:

Activity

Deliverable

Points

Document Submission

Complete lab report and answer questions

· Purpose (2 point)

· Questions (8 points)

· Reflection (5 points)

15

Total

Complete all lab

15

4

Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role.

 Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role.  

SOAP NOTE week 5

 

  
Soap Note 1 is based on the Case Study # 1

1.Templates used from another classes will not be accepted. Student must use the template provided in this class which must clearly contain the progress note (in the Assessment section) of the encounter with the patient ( this section is clearly mark in bold, highlighted  and underlined). No passing grade will be granted if this section is not completed properly. 
2.Follow the MRU Soap Note Rubric as a guide
3.Use APA format and must include minimum of 2 Scholarly Citations.

4.Check for plagiarism,Turn it in Score must be less than 25% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated.
5.The use of tempates is ok with regards to Turn it in, but the Patient History, CC, HPI, The Assessment and Plan should be of your own work and individualized to your made up patient.  

6.The case study does not contain all the information related to the patient, so you must complete each step of the template according to the symptoms, signs, treatment, diagnostic methods, plan, education, etc. according to the patient’s diagnosis.

7. Attached you can find the rubric and SOAP note template. Also you can find one example.

Lessons

Please complete all of the lessons and send the certificates. There should be a total of 5 lessons with the link provided. Please send the certificates when finished. After each lesson there are a few questions based on the reading.



https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education-and-outreach/human-research-protection-training/human-research-protection-foundational-training/index.htmlLinks to an external site.
 

Planning for the future examination

Please see the attachment for the instructions

home wok Amy 3yres old patient

 

Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test.

Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment.

 Amy, a 3 year old girl is brought to your office by her mother because she has a fever and complains that her ear hurts. She has no significant medical history. The child is not pleased to be in the provider’s office and has been crying. Her mother explains that she developed a “cold” about 3 days ago with sniffles. As she cries she continues to cough and has yellowish nasal discharge.  

Attention………Remember that your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

Nursing Week 6 APA Assignment

 

As a baccalaureate-prepared nursing professional what role will you take to advocate for culturally diverse clients in your healthcare practice?

  • Sections of the assignment must include:
    Introduction
    Focus points covered in the discussion posts
    Any arguments and rationales for your stance
    Conclusion or Summary
  • The components of your APA Assignment includes the following:
    The assignment must be completed on a word document.
    Your APA Assignment must include a title page (Refer to Purdue OWL).
    All in-text citations must be used when paraphrasing or quoting a previous author.
    All references must reflect the in-text citations used.
    All reference sources must be within the past 5 years unless it is the works of a nurse theorist or a significant reference material.
    The length of the assignment must be 750-1000 words. Please pay attention to spelling and grammar. Points are deducted for repeat offenders.
    Upon completion of the assignment, you must submit it via Turnitin.com and please note that your plagiarism score should be no more than 20%. If you score higher, please make adjustments.
    (Please refer to the APA Grading rubric for additional assistance in completing your assignment).
    You may reach out to the College Writing Center for further assistance.