wk7

Week 7: Intervention for Proposed Clinical Change Project

You are designing an executable population-based change project addressing identified
practice-related problems or questions. This strongly emphasizes collaboration between
advanced practice nurses and community agencies and include working with an agency
using practice data to provide answers, which are responsive to the needs of clinicians,
administrators, and policy makers for improvement of programs or practices.

This section of the change project should include a discussion of key concepts.

1. Clarify the issue under study.
2. Propose solutions or interventions based on the literature
3. Compare other views on the problem and solutions.
4. Address the APRN role in the intervention and discuss implications for clinical

practice.
5. Discuss the implications of your change project.
6. Some important things to consider and address:
7. Does your intervention have a clear connection to your research problem?
8. What are the specific methods of data collection you are going to use, such as

surveys, interviews, questionnaires, or protocols?
9. How do you intend to analyze your results?
10. Provide a justification for subject selection and sampling procedure.
11. Describe potential limitations. Are there any practical limitations that could affect

your data collection? How will you attempt to control the limitations?
12. How will your change project help fill gaps in understanding the research

problem?
13. This section should be 6–7 pages in length, not including the cover or reference

page. You must reference a minimum of 5 scholarly articles.

14. Use the current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review

the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.

Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome Content 64 to >52.48 pts

Meets Expectations

Succinctly clarifies the issue under study. Provides

a brief summary of the project including main

points and anticipated findings. Provides keen

insight into obstacles and proposes sound,

creative solutions or interventions based on the

literature review findings. Expertly compares other

views on the problem and solutions with detail.

Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role

in the intervention and discusses implications for

clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the

implications of the change project and its

significance to the nursing profession and filling

gaps in knowledge. Accurately categorizes and

thoroughly explains specific methods of data

collection to be used. Explains in detail how data

will be analyzed and used. Provides a sound

justification for subject selection and sampling

procedure. Accurately and thoroughly describes

potential limitations to data collection and control.

Meets all of the criteria of the written assignment.

64 pts

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome

Organization
8 to >6.56 pts

Meets Expectations

Content is well written throughout. Information is

well organized and clearly communicated.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome APA

Format/Mechanics

8 to >6.56 pts

Meets Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format,

length, source citations, and layout. The

assignment is free of spelling and grammatical

errors.

8 pts

Total Points: 80

  • Week 7: Intervention for Proposed Clinical Change Project

fundamentals M 1 b

Delivering Client Centered Care

 

kaffy

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a vital component of contemporary healthcare, transforming the landscape of patient-centered care across the lifespan. A significant body of evidence, such as the peer-reviewed article titled “Shared decision-making in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of its effects on patient outcomes” by Stacey J. Pereira et al. published in the Annals of Family Medicine in 2021, underscores the merits of SDM in promoting health and delivering client-centered care.

SDM epitomizes a collaborative process where patients and healthcare providers harmoniously engage in making healthcare decisions. This process revolves around the amalgamation of the best available clinical evidence with the unique values and preferences of the patient. The systematic review and meta-analysis examined 57 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), offering compelling insights into the affirmative influence of SDM on various patient outcomes. These encompassed heightened patient satisfaction, an improved quality of life, reduced decisional regret, greater adherence to treatment regimens, and superior clinical outcomes such as enhanced blood pressure control, glucose management, and cholesterol levels.

There are two overarching reasons that substantiate SDM as an essential and exemplary healthcare practice. Firstly, SDM is rooted in the principle of respecting the autonomy and right to self-determination of patients. It elevates the patient to an active, informed decision-maker in their care, ensuring that their voice is both heard and honored in the decision-making process. Secondly, SDM consistently demonstrates its prowess in enhancing patient outcomes. This patient-centered approach fosters an environment where patients feel valued and involved, leading to increased satisfaction, a better quality of life, and a notable reduction in decisional regret. Moreover, it fortifies patient adherence to treatment plans and significantly betters clinical outcomes.

In the realm of healthcare, SDM transcends being a mere process; it becomes a conduit for the realization of optimal care and health promotion. It effectively personalizes care delivery, ensuring that interventions align with each patient's unique needs, values, and preferences. Importantly, SDM nurtures trust and rapport between patients and healthcare providers, serving as the bedrock of effective communication. When patients feel heard and respected, it paves the way for open and honest dialogues, which, in turn, bolster healthcare decisions and ultimately lead to improved health outcomes. Additionally, SDM is instrumental in empowering patients to be active participants in their health journeys. It fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility for their well-being, thus propelling health promotion efforts to new heights.

In conclusion, the evidence gleaned from the systematic review and meta-analysis by Stacey J. Pereira et al. underscores the pivotal role of SDM in modern healthcare. By respecting patient autonomy and consistently yielding positive patient outcomes, SDM epitomizes a best practice that is integral to the delivery of client-centered care and the promotion of health across the life span. Its capacity to personalize care, foster trust, and empower patients underscores its status as a cornerstone of contemporary healthcare delivery.

Okafor Aboh

he/him/his

19 hours ago, at 10:45 PM

Top of Form

In healthcare allowing the patient to have the autonomy over their own healthcare decisions is an important part in delivering client center care and promoting health. It is important that all parties of the healthcare team work together to achieve the desired needs of the patient. An important “best practice technique” to perform to achieve this is to provide patient centered communication. This means that the patients care is centered around the clients values, health concerns, and beliefs. It is also important for the patient to have an effective trustworthy relationship with nurse or provider on their team so they can effectively establish any possible personal or behavioral related barriers that may interfere with the care of the client. 

Patient centered care reflects strictly on the specific needs of the individual patient and the best effective ways to provide them. Providing healthcare services that reflect and respect the needs of the patient results in positive outcomes for the clients health outside of the facility. Patient centered care requires the healthcare team to show respect towards the client, their needs, preferences, and values. When all parties are on the same page it makes an easier recovery process for the client and a smoother visit for the healthcare professionals. 

Nursing Research

    

Assignment

The background and significance (B&S) paper is a five (5) page paper in APA format (excluding title page, abstract, references and appendices) that could form the introductory section of your clinical scholarly project. 

The B&S will introduce a clinical problem and the clinical context that led you to identify the clinical question. You will review the relevant background literature and theory related to the problem. You will discuss the relevance of this review to a local clinical setting at the unit, organizational, metropolitan, state, national, and international levels as applicable. 

You will discuss the potential benefits and challenges of addressing the clinical question in the local setting, and explore the larger contextual impact related to this problem. 

Please note, this paper will discuss the introductory background literature and theoretical basis related to a clinical problem. 

Clinical Topic Assigned: The Prevalence of Depression and Suicide Ideation Among Adolescents.

Acne

  

Instructions: Select one of the topic mentioned below and discuses filling the attached form.

Topics: 

Acne

Requirements

– The discussion must address the topic

– Rationale must be provided

– May use examples from your nursing practicege or references in the 600 words)

Ø May use examples from your nursing practice

– Plagiarism is NOT permittedt older than 5 years. Not Websites are allowed.

Ø Use 3 academic sources, not older than 5 years. Not Websites are allowed.

Ø Plagiarism is NOT permitted

Cap: 2 and 3 (4900)

Assessment 2 (5 -7 pages)

Assessment 3 ( 5-7 pages)

assingment 7-1

please follow all directions

maternal m1 diss

 

  • Review primary, secondary and tertiary prevention using Healthy People 2030 as a guide for current initiatives related to the health of women and infants.
  • Relate the three levels of prevention to the health of infants and at-risk women in your community.
  • Describe how a prevention program could positively impact specific risk factors for the health of women and infants in your community.

week two

this is based off the week one evidence based 600 assignment 

Discuss the theoretical framework or model that you intend to use for your capstone project. How does your chosen framework relate  to your phenomenon of interest and research?

Expectations

Initial Post:

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Nursing

1. Give an example of how you have advocated for a patient, peer or subordinate and the outcome.  How did acting as an advocate help you grow as a leader? (application).

2. Describe an example of strategic or operational planning you have seen in your place of work and appraise the outcome (pros and/or cons) of this planning (evaluation).

3. Analyze the type of organizational structure at your place of work, (which structure does it most closely resemble and why?) How does the structure influence mission, vision, philosophy, and values (evaluation)

4. Which power-building strategies (organizational, political and or personal) have you found to be the most effective for enhancing your personal power and why?  Which has been the least effective or hardest to achieve and why?

Case Study 3

 

Answer the questions in both scenarios in your own words. Answer these questions as if you were talking to a peer, unless otherwise indicated.

Shock Case Studies

Scenario #1

K.L., a 25-yr-old Korean American, was not wearing his seat belt when he was the driver involved in a motor vehicle crash. The windshield was broken and K.L. was found 10 ft from his car. He was face down, conscious, and moaning. His wife and daughter were found in the car with their seat belts on. They sustained minor injuries and were very frightened and upset. All passengers were taken to the emergency department (ED). The following information pertains to K.L.

Subjective Data

  • States, “I can’t breathe”
  • Cries out when abdomen is palpated

Objective Data

Physical Examination:

  • Cardiovascular: BP 80/56 mm Hg; apical pulse 138 but no palpable radial or pedal pulses; carotid pulse present but weak
  • Respiratory: respiratory rate 35 breaths/minute; labored breathing with shallow respirations; asymmetric chestwall movement; absence of breath sounds on left side
  • Trachea deviated slightly to the right
  • Abdomen: slightly distended and left upper quadrant painful on palpation
  • Musculoskeletal: open compound fracture of the lower left leg

Diagnostic Studies

  • Chest x-ray: Hemothorax and six rib fractures on left side
  • Hematocrit: 28%

Interprofessional Care in the ED

  • Intraosseous access in right proximal tibia placed prehospital
  • Left chest tube placed, draining bright red blood
  • Fluid resuscitation started with crystalloids
  • High-flow O2via non-rebreather mask

Emergency Surgical Procedures

  • Splenectomy
  • Repair of torn intercostal artery
  • Repair of compound fracture

Discussion Questions

  1. What types of shock is K.L. experiencing? What clinical manifestations did he display that support your answer?
  2. What were the causes of K.L.’s shock states? What are other causes of these types of shock?
  3. Priority Decision: What are the priority nursing responsibilities for K.L.?
  4. Priority Decision: What ongoing nursing assessment parameters are essential for this patient?
  5. What are his potential complications?
  6. Patient-Centered Care: K.L.’s parents arrive. English is their second language. They are very anxious and asking about their son. What can you do to provide culturally competent family-centered care?
  7. Priority Decision: Based on the assessment data presented, what are the priority nursing diagnoses?
  8. Teamwork and Collaboration: Identify the tasks that could be delegated to unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP).
  9. Evidence-Based Practice: You are orienting a new graduate RN. He asks you why crystalloids are used instead of colloids for fluid resuscitation. What is your response?
  10. Examine therapeutic nursing interventions associated end-of-life decision-making.

 The following is information that will assist you in answering the question associated with scenario #2

Septic shock is

“A life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” (McCance & Huether, 2019, p. 1550).

The infectious process starts with an infectious agent entering the bloodstream and causing bacteremia either directly from the site of infection or indirectly by releasing toxic substances into the bloodstream. Some of the most common causes of septic shock are gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria, viruses, and fungi. The most common sites of infection are the lungs, bloodstream, intravascular catheters, intra-abdominal, urinary tract, and surgical wounds (McCance & Huether, 2019).

Normal Physiology

In normal physiology, when a pathogen invades the body, the body will react with local and systemic responses.

  • Our first line of defense is the body’s natural physical, mechanical, and biochemical barriers such as the epithelial cells and surfaces of the skin. These defenses prevent microorganisms from getting into tissues and also have the ability to remove infectious microorganisms. The surfaces of the skin and mucous membranes of the body also contain normal microbiomes (“normal flora”) that also protects the body by releasing chemicals to prevent pathogens from being colonized (McCance & Huether, 2019).
  • The body’s second line of defense is the inflammatory response. Inflammation causes a vascular response that makes vessel walls become leaky and more permeable and makes white blood cells adhere to vessel walls and migrate out into the tissues. Symptoms usually produced by inflammation are the heat, redness, edema and pain. The goal of inflammation is to prevent and limit infection and interact with components of the adaptive immune system as well as prepare the body for healing (McCance & Huether, 2019). 

There are three important plasma protein systems involved to provide an active barrier against invading pathogens in the inflammatory response.

  • One is a complement system which destroys pathogens directly and work with other components of the immune responses by three pathways: (1) classic, (2) lectin and (3) alternative. The main functions of these are to induce rapid mast cell degranulation, attract white blood cells to pathogens, and “tag” pathogens for destruction (McCance & Huether, 2019).
  • Second is the clotting or coagulation system which forms blood clots that include a meshwork of protein strands at the injured or inflamed site to stop bleeding, trap pathogens to prevent the spread of infection, and provide a framework for repair and healing (McCance & Huether, 2019).
  • The last important inflammatory response is from the kinin system which activates and assists inflammatory cells by the release of mainly bradykinin which causes dilation of blood vessels, pain, smooth muscle contraction, increase vascular permeability and leukocyte chemotaxis (McCance & Huether, 2019). 

There are also many biochemical mediators of the innate immune system that secrete cytokines responsible for activating other cells such as interleukins, chemokines, interferons, and other molecules. These chemicals are important to the vascular changes that occur during the inflammatory process (McCance & Huether, 2019).

Along with the cellular mediators are the cellular components such as platelets, phagocytes (neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells), natural killer cells, and lymphocytes. The components respond to the site of the injury together to limit the tissue injury, kill pathogens, remove the debris, and prepare for healing and tissue repair (McCance & Huether, 2019). 

Septic shock begins when the pathogen enters the bloodstream. This stimulates the release toxic substances called the triggering molecules, which triggers the body to activate the proinflammatory responses and release proinflammatory cells such as leukocytes, macrophages, monocytes and platelets as well as proinflammatory mediators such as cytokines (interleukins, tumor necrosis factor alpha and other mediators). Cytokines along with the vasoactive peptides cause vasodilation causing hypotension, relative hypovolemia, and decreased in oxygen delivery to the tissues. The release of proinflammatory cytokines also activate plasma protein systems of the complement, coagulation and kinin systems (McCance & Huether, 2019).

Dysfunction of epithelial cells cause further capillary leaking and microvascular thrombus, tissue hypoxia and apoptosis. Due to tissue hypoxia, the body will start breaking down carbohydrates to make ATP or energy for the body. As more anaerobic cells are being used for energy, the more lactic acid is produced. Without correction, the accumulation will lead to metabolic acidosis causing further damage to the tissues (McCance & Huether, 2019).  

As the responses of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators intensify the body experiences persistent low arterial pressure, low tissue perfusion, low systemic vascular resistance which will profoundly affect the circulatory, cellular, and metabolic systems. These responses will lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) due to dysfunction of the kidneys, liver, intestines, lungs, and brain as a result of tissue hypoxia and lack of tissue perfusion (McCance & Huether, 2019). 

Tools

Septic shock is measured by the SOFA score and assessing different systems in relation to the severity of the organ failure. The quick SOFA criteria include a respiratory rate equal or greater than 22 per minutes, altered mentation and systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg. The standard SOFA scoring includes respiration, coagulation of platelets, bilirubin level of the liver, mean arterial pressure, Glasgow coma scale score, creatinine level, and urine output.

Clinical manifestations

Clinical manifestations of septic shock usually include fever, chills, sweating, warm progressing to cool skin, respiratory distress, altered mentation, decreased urine output, hypotension, elevated liver enzymes, and decreased platelet counts (McCance & Huether, 2019). 

Scenario #2

Mr. S. S. is a 56-year-old, white male with a right diabetic foot ulcer. He was at his podiatrist’s office for a wound check and was referred to the emergency department (ED) due to increasing purulent drainage and necrotic tissue in the wound. Mr. S.S. noticed the drainage getting worse over the last week and has experienced fevers up to 102 degrees F for two days. He also complains of diaphoresis, fatigue, abdominal pain, and general malaise. He states he just does not feel like himself.  

Past Medical History:

Allergic to Penicillin and shellfish

Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 

Hyperlipidemia

Hypertension [baseline 140/90]

Obesity [BMI=32]

Cholecystectomy, age 32 years

Left Above the Knee Amputation (AKA), age 54 years

Pertinent Family History:

Mother- Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, CABG x2 vessels

Father- Prostate Cancer, age 63 years

Pertinent Social History:

Active Smoker (2 packs/day)

History of Alcoholism

Previous history of homelessness

Emergency Department

In the ED, assessment reveals moderate foul odor, purulent drainage from right foot ulcer, and capillary refill of four seconds on upper and lower extremities. Patient is alert and oriented but short-term memory appears to be impaired and the patient is asking abnormal questions. Two peripheral IVs and an indwelling foley catheter are placed, a 1000mL bolus of IVF is initiated, wound and blood cultures are obtained, and the patient is started on broad spectrum antibiotics. An x-ray of his right foot demonstrates soft tissue inflammation and concern for osteomyelitis, so an MRI was completed of his foot. The patient is transferred to MICU for further management. 

ED Vitals:

Temperature: 101.6 degrees F

Heart Rate: 117 bpm

Respiration Rate: 24 breaths/min

Blood Pressure: 92/45 mm Hg (MAP 61)

Blood glucose: 315 mg/dL

SpO2: 91% on 2L NC

ED Labs:

WBC: 26,000

Lactate: 6.0 mmol/L

C-reactive Protein: 11mg/L

Creatinine: 1.4 mg/dL

pH: 7.32

Medical Intensive Care Unit

Upon admission to MICU, Mr. S.S. is lethargic and flushed. Further assessment demonstrates bounding pulses and right lower extremity edema. His heart rate increased and blood pressure dropped despite the liter bolus. The patient is started on vasopressors to maintain his blood pressure and intubated to protect his airway.

Pertinent Vitals:

Temperature: 101.4 degrees

Heart Rate: 154 bpm

Respiration Rate: 30 breaths/min

Blood Pressure: 72/34 (MAP 47)

SpO2: 86% on 2L NC

  1. All of the options below are the most common causes of septic shock except for: 
    1. Gram-negative bacteria
    2. Gram-positive bacteria
    3. Viruses
    4. Cancer
  2. Which of the following criteria would you expect to see from a patient with septic shock?
    1. Elevated lactate level
    2. 30 ml/hr of urine output
    3. Respiration of 18 rate per minute
    4. Patient is alert and oriented 
  3. Which of the following are measurable components of the quick SOFA? Select all that apply.
    1. Respiration rate
    2. Temperature
    3. Heart rate
    4. Systolic blood pressure 
    5. Mentation
  4. The patient wants to know more about sepsis asking if he or any of his family members would be at higher risk for sepsis. You tell the patient that most vulnerable patients for this problem would be: (Select all that apply)
    1. Children younger than one
    2. Patients who have received recommended vaccinations
    3. Adults 65 years old and older
    4. People with weakened immune systems
    5. People with chronic diseases
    6. People have been traveled outside of the United States
  5. Discuss why septic shock is one of the leading causes of death in the intensive care units.
  6. Examine therapeutic nursing interventions associated end-of-life decision-making.