Healthcare system flaws during the pandemic

 

Refer to the required reading: COVID-19 and the Need for Health Care Reform (King, 2020)  NEJM. 

Identify 1 flaw in the US healthcare system that was made evident during the pandemic, and 1 innovation during the pandemic that improved healthcare.

** Add two (2) additional references to make a total of three references

DISCUSSION REPLIES about middle range theories

Attached below are the 4 discussions to reply to using the prompt

The interpretation of research in health care is essentia

The interpretation of research in health care is essential to decision-making. By understanding research, health care providers can identify risk factors, trends, outcomes for treatment, health care costs, and best practices. To be effective in evaluating and interpreting research, the reader must first understand how to interpret the findings.

Nursing

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
  • Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
  • Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience. 

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
  • Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
  • Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
  • Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
  • Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
  • Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
  • Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
    • A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)

Reply

In order to reflect on and analyze how the relationship between health and behavior affects the social determinants of health, I would like to share the analysis based on the latter. Accredited institutions and organizations such as the WHO, consider or identify the social determinants of health in the context where human beings are born, in the life spaces where they develop, as well as in the workplace and in the social system of interactions where the person makes his life Now, the way they do their life, the behavioral actions they carry out, are the ones that in one way or another will affect the health of the human being. Many times we talk about behavior and we do not associate it with health and that is where we must gain in general culture and assimilate that this influences from the moment we obtain, for example, the information from a medical diagnosis. In this sense, people react differently and adopt dissimilar ways to their treatment, they are not always the appropriate behaviors or postures, an issue that directly affects their health and is also associated with the human resources available to deal with the disease health process (Soriano & Jiménez, 2023).

The balance that is achieved between the physical state of health and psychosocial well-being, the best state of health refers to the person. There are behaviors that contribute positively to health, there we find an adequate and balanced diet, the practice of physical activity, avoiding by all means the consumption of toxic substances, the rest that the body requires during sleep hours, avoiding self-medication, among others. However, maintaining this balance based on health, and even more so when suffering from already established diseases, requires an environment that encourages this behavior, as well as people who accompany the transit through life in a healthy way, so that the interaction with the people of the closest and social environment contribute to the positive and not to negative behaviors for health. We are biopsychosocial beings and from there we react and develop (Cereceda, 2022).

    That is why nursing within its metaparadigms contains the dialectical relationships between its main concepts (person, environment, health and nurse). In those relationships that occur from theory and practice in nursing, there is integration between patients and nurses for their transformation in the care process to achieve their necessary transformations for their healing and social integration. These relationships between health and disease are currently focused on a paradigmatic vision of holistic care for health care, where the human being must be seen as a whole, not as the simple care of its parts. A human being who, by reacting negatively, influences his health, if he does not take care of his body or attacks it with toxins, in the same way his behavior brings consequences for his health and for those around him.

MSN 5550 CASE STUDY

 Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed.  

Please check for  plagiarism and AI(artificial intelligence).The work must be in your own words.The last case study my score was too low due to high percent in AI.

Attached you can find the case study.

WK 11 journal entry

Please see attachment for directions

Case study week 10 MSN 5550

 Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed.  

Please check for plagiarism and AI(artificial intelligence)

Attached you can find the case study.

intervention plan design to improve the quality of outcomes for your target population and setting. related to combating or preventing veterans homelessness

Develop a 4-6 page holistic intervention plan design to improve the quality of outcomes for your target population and setting.TOPIC: combating and preventing veterans homelessness

ntroduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Your application of the PICOT approach to developing your problem statement and the research that you conducted and synthesized in your literature review are the foundation and framework that you will need to successfully build your intervention plan. This plan will lay out specific components of the intervention you are planning to address the need you have identified for the target population and setting. You will justify your approach to the intervention plan by integrating appropriate theoretical foundations. You will also analyze and address the needs of stakeholders, requirements of regulatory bodies, and ethical and legal considerations. It is important to have a sound intervention plan design in place before trying to work on the details of implementation and evaluation.

Preparations

  • Read Guiding Questions: Intervention Plan Design [DOC]. This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete this assessment.
  • As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
    • What theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies could help support or justify your approach to the intervention plan?
    • What evidence from the literature or best practice supports the intervention plan components you identified?
    • What, if any, potential is there for technology to help in the development or implementation of the intervention plan components?
    • What is the impact of stakeholders, health care policy, or regulations?
    • Are there any ethical or legal considerations related to the development or implementation of the intervention plan components that need to be kept in mind? If so, what are they?

Instructions

Note: The assessments in this course are sequenced in such a way as to help you build specific skills that you will use throughout your program. Complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

You intervention plan design will be the second section of your final project submission. The goal for this is to design a holistic plan that should be able to improve the quality of outcomes for your target population and setting. Provide enough detail so that the faculty member assessing your intervention plan design will be able to provide substantive feedback that you will be able to incorporate into the other project components in this course, as well as into the final draft of your project.

At minimum, be sure to address the bullet points below, as they correspond to the grading criteria. You may also want to read the scoring guide and Guiding Questions: Intervention Plan Design document (linked above) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. In addition to the bullet points below, provide a brief introduction that refreshes the reader’s memory about your problem statement and the setting and context for this intervention plan.

Reminder: these instructions are an outline. Your heading for this this section should be Intervention Plan Components and not Part 1: Intervention Plan Components.

Part 1: Intervention Plan Components
  • Define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.
  • Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components.
Part 2: Theoretical Foundations
  • Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan.
  • Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices.
Part 3: Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
  • Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan.
Part 4: Ethical and Legal Implications
  • Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan.
Address Generally Throughout
  • Communicate intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention.