sociology project final

The purpose of this essay is to apply C. W. Mills’s Sociological Imagination
concept to explain a personal situation. The essay will demonstrate the
student’s ability to use sociological concepts & theories learned in the
course, to describe a personal situation. The topic is left to the student’s
discretion.

The Essay paper should have the following 5 content areas:

1. Introduction: In this first content area, write a paragraph introducing C.
W. Mills’s concept of sociological imagination, and give a general overview
of how you will be applying it to the personal situation that you will discuss
in your paper.

2. Personal Explanation: In this second content area, describe your
personal situation/topic. Based on whether the situation is a current one or
a past one, describe how you dealt or are dealing with it. You can also pick
a situation from a person’s life who is closely related to you or whose
experience affected you. You should know the person well enough to write
the essay.

Describe what caused the problem, who were involved, what were others’
and your roles in the situation, and if a resolution was reached. This section
is all about your account of your situation and should be no longer than four
paragraphs (3/4 – 1 page).

3. Sociological Imagination: In this third content area, analyze your
personal situation by applying sociological imagination, i.e., examine how
society and social forces affected your situation. This section should be the
most substantial portion of your essay. You should use terms and concepts
from at least 3 different chapters from the textbook, and one sociological
theory.

4. Data/Stats: Utilize at least 2 statistics or research studies from the
textbook or outside sources such as the Galen College online library. The
references should be scholarly and should be relevant to your situation
(E.g., Inclusion of divorce rates in the US if the topic is on Divorce;
inclusion of poverty rates, crime and victimization rates, or suicide rates if
the topic is either on Poverty or Crime). Citing at least one outside
source is required.

5. Conclusion: Write a wrap-up conclusion summarizing the major finding/
themes in your paper. This should be no more than a paragraph.

 

Your essay should be 4-6 pages in length (excluding the title page and the
references page) and should be double-spaced. You will lose points if your
essay is shorter than 4 full pages of content. The font should be 12-point
Calibri or Times New Roman. Use APA format for your entire essay,
including for references and in-text citations and edit your work carefully for
spelling and grammar.

Your essay should be 4-6 pages in length (excluding the title page and the
references page). It should be double-spaced on standard-sized paper
(8.5” x 11”) with a 1” margin on all sides. The font should be 12-point Times
New Roman or Calibri. Use APA formatting throughout your essay and cite
any sources you use.

Nursing

Instructions:

1.
Topic Selection: Select a topic that interests you and that is relevant to nursing Pediatric practice. Your topic should be broad enough to allow for an in-depth exploration but narrow enough to be manageable within the scope of a 
500-650 word research paper. You may select a topic related to patient care, nursing education, health promotion, or any other area of nursing practice that interests you. 

2.
Searching for Literature: After choosing a topic and 
obtaining my approval for the topic, use the Library page at the FNU.edu website to search for scholarly sources related to your topic. You must utilize 
at least 3 scholarly sources that have been published 
within the last 5 years. You may use databases such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalKey, The Cochrane Library. Be sure to use appropriate keywords and to apply search filters to limit your search to 
scholarly, peer-reviewed articles.

3.
Evaluating Sources: Once you have identified potential sources, be sure to identify if they are relevant to your topic, written by credible authors, and based on rigorous research methods.

4.
Writing the Paper: Your research paper should follow 
APA 7 guidelines and include an 
introduction and 
conclusion. Be sure 
references are cited throughout the paper and included in a 
reference list at the end of your paper.

5. Please keep in mind that the paper will be checked for plagiarism, and 
similarity above 25% that is not cited will not be accepted for submission. 

6. Please refer to the evaluation rubric for evaluation criteria 

Topic: breastfeeding vs formula feeding.

OFF-LABEL DRUG USE IN PEDIATRICS

The unapproved use of approved drugs, also called off-label use, with children is quite common. This is because pediatric dosage guidelines are typically unavailable, since very few drugs have been specifically researched and tested with children.

When treating children, prescribers often adjust dosages approved for adults to accommodate a child’s weight. However, children are not just “smaller” adults. Adults and children process and respond to drugs differently in their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion.

Children even respond differently during stages from infancy to adolescence. This poses potential safety concerns when prescribing drugs to pediatric patients. As an advanced practice nurse, you have to be aware of safety implications of the off-label use of drugs with this patient group.

 To Prepare:

  • Review the interactive media piece in this week’s Resources and reflect on the types of drugs used to treat pediatric patients with mood disorders.
  • Reflect on situations in which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use.
  • Think about strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Consider specific off-label drugs that you think require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.

Write a 1-page narrative in APA format that addresses the following:

  • Explain the circumstances under which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Describe strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Include descriptions and names of off-label drugs that require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.
  • Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2019i). Therapy for pediatric clients with mood disordersLinks to an external site. [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Assessing a Health care Program and policy Evaluation

  Resouces

To Prepare:

  • Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
  • Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation, or choose one of interest to you.
  • Review community, state, or federal policy evaluations and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
  • How was the success of the program or policy measured?
  • How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
  • How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
  • At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
  • What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
  • What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
  • What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
  • Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
  • Would you recommend implementing this program or policy at your place of work? Why or why not?
  • Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.

REPLY

The role of nurses in the COVID-19 vaccination mandate, telemedicine, and prescription drug pricing is pivotal in advocating for and ensuring a more efficient and patient-centered healthcare system. First and foremost, nurses have played an indispensable role in the global fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Their contribution to the vaccination efforts has been monumental. Nurses have not only administered vaccines but also served as the face of hope and comfort to countless individuals receiving the vaccine. Their compassionate and humanistic approach has helped alleviate vaccine hesitancy and fear, ensuring that a larger segment of the population gets vaccinated. Beyond the actual vaccination process, nurses have been at the forefront of patient education, conducting interviews to gather crucial health information, and explaining the importance of immunization. Their meticulous monitoring of patients for adverse reactions has been essential in maintaining the safety of the vaccination process. In essence, nurses have been the linchpin of prevention during this pandemic, working tirelessly to protect public health (Pérez, 2021).

Telemedicine, another significant development in healthcare, has been further accelerated by the pandemic. Nurses have been instrumental in the adoption and effective implementation of telemedicine services. Through telehealth platforms, nurses have been able to provide care remotely, ensuring that patients continue to receive vital medical attention while minimizing the risk of virus transmission. This has been especially crucial for individuals with chronic conditions who require regular check-ups and monitoring. Nurses have not only conducted virtual consultations but have also played a vital role in educating patients on how to use telemedicine effectively. They have bridged the gap between technology and healthcare, making it more accessible and user-friendly for patients, ultimately saving them time, money, and, most importantly, lives.

On the front of prescription drug pricing, nurses have also been advocates for patients. The pandemic disrupted global supply chains, leading to fluctuations in the prices of essential medications, particularly for individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Nurses, as patient advocates, have been vocal in highlighting the challenges patients face due to rising drug costs. They have played a crucial role in bringing attention to this issue at both the individual patient level and within healthcare organizations. Nurses have been at the forefront of working with healthcare providers to explore cost-effective alternatives and to ensure that patients continue to have access to the medications they need. Their advocacy extends to policy discussions, pushing for reforms in drug pricing that would prioritize patient affordability and well-being (OPS, 2023).

In conclusion, nurses have demonstrated their indispensable role as advocates in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have tirelessly worked to administer vaccines, provide compassionate care, and promote prevention. Nurses have embraced telemedicine as a means to deliver care remotely, making it accessible and convenient for patients. Additionally, they have been vocal advocates for patients grappling with rising prescription drug prices, working to ensure that healthcare remains patient-centered. The pandemic has highlighted the resilience, dedication, and advocacy of nurses, reinforcing their crucial position in shaping the future of healthcare.

Writing

1st 

 

The Theory of Goal Attainment and Transactional process is a theory that guides nurses to practice nursing based on a personal approach. It is a Grand Theory based on Interactive Process.  The purpose of this theory is to be able to achieve patients’ goals by forming a relationship with the client or patient. To be able to form a relationship with a patient/client there are several factors that have to be consider.  One of the main factors that has to be consider is the fact that the patient is a unique individual and as such nurses must think how to approach this patient to form a therapeutic relationship that will involve the patient in his/her own healthcare goals.

The goal of attainment has impacted research, education, and the nursing. However, it has impacted nursing education in particular. “For example, it served as a frame work for the baccalaureate program at the Ohio State University School of Nursing where it determined the content and process taught at each level of the program” (McEwen & Wills,2023, p. 177).

The development of this theory was created by Imogene King in the 1960’s.  “During this time nursing practice was not so much based on theory.  Nursing practice was generally prescribed by others and highlighted by traditional, ritualistic tasks with little regard to rational” (McEwen & Wills, 2023, p.25).

It is interesting to know that this theory has been used not only for the purpose of education, research and nursing practice but it has also help to develop other theories.   “In addition to application in practice and research described previously, King’s work has been the basis for development of several middle-range nursing theories.  For example, was used by Rooda (1992)  to develop a model for multicultural nursing practice” (McEwen & Wills, 2023, p. 117)> 

2nd 

Virginia Henderson was born in Missouri and raised in Virginia. She grew up to receive her diploma in nursing from the Amy School of Nursing located at Walter Reed Hospital. Within two years of working as a bedside nurse her passion for the profession grew immensely.  She applied to and was offered a nurse educator position at a hospital in Virginia. From that day Henderson embarked on a lifelong mission to educate nurses on her concept of the nursing profession. Over a decade she had  went on to obtain her Bachelors of Nursing degree in 1932 and her Master’s degree in 1934. Her concept and theories evolved and was imitative of her passion, practice and education. 

The philosophical and structural components of her theory was focused on educating nurses and providing patient care in an encouraging environment. Henderson was introduced to physiologic principles during her graduate education. The study of these principles was the fundamental basis of her framework for patient care (Henderson, 1965, 1991). The physiologic principle implies that the patient’s biology, psychology and sociology (biopsychosocial) all had to be taken into consideration when providing care. As her studies and work experience progressed, she was also introduced to “Thorndike’s fundamental needs of a man” (McEwen, Grand Nursing Theories Based on Human Needs 2022), in which she gave credit to as having a direct influence on her beliefs. Another major concept of her theory is that nurses should assist patients with otherwise daily activities of life in times of illness until the patient is back to their optimistic level of health. Overall, helping the patient to regain independence by providing a supportive environment. Her concept of nursing included the nurse assisting the patient with 14 activities.

Henderson’s theory of nursing has immensely affected nursing education, nursing research and nursing practice.  Lucier (2018), for example, described how Henderson’s model could be used to enhance the nurse−patient relationship to provide holistic care at the end of life. Similarly, Waller-Wise (2013) found that Henderson’s theory assisted nurses in attaining excellence in childbirth education, and Miranda et al. (2018) used Henderson’s assumptions and model in their analysis of the concept of “nursing care of overweight children.” (McEwen, Grand Nursing Theories Based on Human Needs 2022). Her contribution to nursing textbooks extended from 1930-1990’s. Her contributions to nursing had a global impact by strengthening the focus on nursing practice and confirming the value of tested interventions in assisting individuals to regain health (McEwen, Grand Nursing Theories Based on Human Needs 2022). Researchers internationally continue to be influenced by Henderson’s model as a framework.

Rubric

 

 

Criteria for Grading Discussion Participation
Interactions should be thorough, thoughtful and facilitate the learning community’s growth.
Behaviors will be reviewed on a weekly basis. Contribution toward the course grade total
will be based on the pattern of demonstrating these characteristics.
Please remember, initial posts should be submitted by midnight by deadline. Your
responses to two of your peers’ initial posts should be made by deadlines, and then
responses to questions or comments made to you on your posts or discussion responses
should be made by deadlines also, per syllabus above.
Rubric for evaluating Discussion Participation
Characteristic of the Response Point Value
 No response 0
 Responses are noncontributory (e.g., “I agree with the comment;”
“I was thinking the same thing:” “I had a similar experience.”
2
 On-time response to all points
 Response is not relevant to other statements or the discussion
thesis
 Response shows minimal understanding of the topic
4
 On-time response to all discussion points
 Response reflects the point being discussed; builds on ideas of
other participants
 Facts and examples are appropriate to each thesis and are
accurate
 Rules of communication, language, etc. are utilized so as not to
distract the flow of discussion
6
 All elements in the 6-point division (above) and
 Responses reflect complete understanding of topic and assigned
readings
 Uses greater detail, examples and other sources to support
discussion
 Initiates another question (which may/may not be discussed by
group0
8
 All elements in the 8-point division (above) and
 Analyses, discussions and conclusions explicitly linked to the
10

 

W10 yu

 The surrogate role is not one that is frequently mentioned in recent nursing practice literature.  Is that role as defined by Peplau relevant to nursing practice as currently experienced.  If so, in what way.  If not, why? 

400 word, 1 reference

Nursing Cultural Wk 4 APA Assignment

 Week Four APA Assignment: Evaluating the socioeconomic impact of healthcare across our diverse communities: Educating our clients regarding accessibility and affordability.

  • Sections of the assignment must include:
    Introduction
    Focus points covered in the discussion posts
    Any arguments and rationales for your stance
    Conclusion or Summary
  • The components of your APA Assignment includes the following:
    The assignment must be completed on a word document.
    Your APA  Assignment must include a title page (Refer to Purdue OWL).
    All in-text citations must be used when paraphrasing or quoting a previous author.
    All references must reflect the in-text citations used.
    All reference sources must be within the past 5 years unless it is the works of a nurse theorist or a significant reference material.
    The length of the assignment must be 750-1000 words. Please pay attention to spelling and grammar. Points are deducted for repeat offenders.
    Upon completion of the assignment, you must submit it via Turnitin.com and please note that your plagiarism score should be no more than 20%. If you score higher, please make adjustments

Answer all question

  

Watch the Netflix documentary “My Beautiful Broken Brain” and answer the following questions.  and  YouTube link to documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Edjly3z5bF4 

questions

Original Work, No Plagiarism, Cite and Reference

Joanna, a psychiatrist, has a busy clinical practice. She is widely recognized as a leader in reducing the number of psychotic episodes that patients with schizophrenia experience. Her treatment modalities are largely informed by her research. She has performed numerous clinical trial studies combining various antipsychotic and other medications to achieve longer intervals without episodes. She has cultivated a trusting relationship with her patients as many have seen her for more than five years as she has provide hope and relief to a great number of them.

Joanna is enrolling participants into a randomized placebo-controlled study with a promising new drug to treat schizophrenia. Although two other psychiatrists in her practice are referring patients to the study, she also decides to offer the protocol to patients in her practice that meet the inclusion criteria.

As part of the consent process, she explains to patients that there is a 50-50 chance whether they are placed in the group receiving the investigational drug or in the group that receives the placebo (sugar pill). She tells them that those who are given placebos will not be offered standard-of-care medicine so that important drug-placebo differences can be identified. Joanna also tells them that rational decision-making does not seem to be affected during short periods of medication-free intervals, according to the most recent research. She does acknowledge that studies have had mixed results about the increased risk of suicidality, however.

One of Joanna’s patients, a potential participant named Duncan, asks how long the study is supposed to last. Joanna knows that Duncan has failed other attempts of reducing the length and severity of his schizophrenic episodes. She also believes that he may be a good candidate for the study—as long as he’s not in the placebo group.  There’s no guarantee that he’ll receive the treatment, or do well on it. If he doesn’t enroll, then his clinical care will go on uninterrupted. If he does enroll, this new experimental drug may be his best shot at receiving an effective treatment so that he can lead a more normal life.

Joanna asks if Duncan is interested. Duncan responds, “Whatever you think is best. You’re the doc.”

Questions:

1. How many different kinds of conflicts of interest does Joanna have?

2. How concerned should she be that her patient(s) might not grasp the risks of participating in a drug trial?

3. In your own words, what is a therapeutic misconception?

4. What do you think motivates patients like Duncan to respond “Whatever you think is best”?

5. Should clinical researchers be allowed to enroll their own patients in a study?